Document Type : Research Paper

Author

MA of Urban Planning, , Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

The main effects of mixed use development as a new approach in land uses layout and spatial relevance are to create diversity and promotion of environmental quality. The diversity of land use in Farokhi Street in Yazd is as ribbon mixed use development. Therefore, the present study sought to assess the environmental quality created by development in the form of mixed use in Farrokhi Street in Yazd and sought to improve its environmental quality and increase the satisfaction of space users. For this purpose, a questionnaire was used to collect data and one-sample t-test, beta regression coefficient and path analysis techniques were used to analyze the data. The results show that users are highly satisfied with the variables of compatibility, land use diversity, social justice, safety and security and vitality. And development as a mixed land use in Farrokhi Street of Yazd has been able to create an attractive urban environment with high quality. Also, the variables of access, safety and security and land use diversity have played the highest share and the criteria of compactness and dispersion of texture have the lowest share in environmental street quality. In general, the intervention priorities to increase the environmental quality of the street are in morphological, as perceptional, functional and social dimensions.

Keywords

  • اسدی، احمد و اکبری، ابراهیم. (1399)، تحلیل فضایی کیفیت زندگی شهروندان در محیط‌های شهری با استفاده از سیستم اطلاعات جغرافیایی (GIS) (مطالعه موردی: منطقه 2 شهر مشهد)، نشریه تحقیقات کاربردی علوم جغرافیایی، شماره 58: 35-52.
  • پاکزاد، جهانشاه،. (1388)، مبانی نظری و فرآیند طراحی شهری، تهران: انتشارات شهیدی.
  • رفیعیان، مجتبی و مولودی، جمشید. (1389)، رویکردها و روش‌های تحلیلی سنجش کیفیت محیط‌های مسکونی شهری، تهران: نشر آذرخش.
  • قهرمانی، مریم؛ پور جعفر، محمدرضا و سعیدی رضوانی، نوید. (1399)، تبیین مدل نوین «تنوع مکان» جهت ارزیابی پهنة کاربری زمین مختلط، دانش شهرسازی، دوره 4، شماره 2: 77-93.

 

  • Aurand, A. (2010). "Density, Housing Types and Mixed Land Use: Smart Tools for Affordable Housing." Urban Studies, 47(5), 1015-1036.
  • Carmona, Heath, Tiesdell , Tim Mathew, and Steve Taner. (2005). Public Places- Urban Spaces- The Dimensions of Urban Design, Architectural Press.
  • Coupland, A. (1997), Reclaiming the city; Mixed Use Development, European Planning Studies.
  • DCAUL (Design Center for American Landscape). (2003). Defining mixed use development.
  • Hoppenbrouwer, Louwe. (2005). "Mixed-Use Development: Theory and Practice in Amsterdam’s Eastern Docklands." European Planning Studies, 13 (7), 967-983.
  • Kaster, Hans R.A. and Jan Rouwendal. (2012). "The impact of Mixed Land Use on Residential Property Values." Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, 52, 733-761.
  • Marans, R. W. )2015). "Quality of urban life & environmental sustainability studies: Future linkage opportunities." Habitat International, 45, 47-52.
  • -McCray, J.W. and Day, s.s. (2003). "understanding environment quality through quality of life studies: the 2001 DAS and objective indicators." Landscape and urban plan, 65, 73-83.
  • OKI’s Community Choices. (2010). Mixed Use Development.
  • Porteous, J.D. (1971). "Design with People-the Quality of the Urban Environment." Environmental and Behavior, 3(2), 155-178.
  • Rowley, Alan. (1996). Mixed-use Development: Ambiguous concept, simplistic analysis and wishful thinking?. Planning Practice and Research.
  • TGM Program Staff. (2001). commercial and mixed use development.
  • The Oregon Transportation and Growth Management. (2010). commercial and mixed use development, code handbook.