نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری معماری، گروه معماری، واحد ساری، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، ساری، ایران

2 استادیار، گروه معماری، واحد ساری، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، ساری، ایران

چکیده

شهرنشینی در جهان سریع‌تر از سابق در حال رشد است. مناظر و طرح‌های محیط‌های شهری بر سلامت روان تأثیر می‌گذارند. این مطالعه به‌منظور تعیین رابطه بین ادراک از متغیرهای محیطی و سلامت روان در محله‌های مسکونی و همچنین نقش ترجیحات محیطی به‌عنوان متغیر میانجی در بین مردم مازندران انجام گردید. پژوهش حاضر با توجه به بررسی نقش ترجیح محیط به‌عنوان متغیر واسطه‌ای بینش جدیدی را در مورد ارتباط میان مؤلفه‌های محیط کالبدی و سلامت روان ارائه می‌دهد. داده‌های موردنیاز ﺑﺎ اﺳﺘﻔﺎده از پرسش‌نامه در دو بخش و به‌طور هم‌زمان جمع‌آوری‌شده‌اند. در بخش اول ﺑﺮای اندازه‌گیری ﺳﻼﻣﺖ روان از پرسشنامه‌ی استاندارد استفاده گردید. سپس ﺑﺮای ﺳﻨﺠﺶ ادراک ویژگی‌های ﻣﺤﻠﻪ و ترجیحات افراد نسبت به محیط ﻣﺤﻠﻪ، تأثیر مؤلفه‌های یکسان، شامل؛ امنیت، امکانات، زیبایی‌شناسی و مقصد اندازه‌گیری شدند. سپس توسط برازش مدل یابی معادلات ساختاری مورد تحلیل قرار گرفتند. نتایج حاکی از این بود که ادراک ویژگی‌های محیط بر میزان سلامت روان مؤثر بوده و عامل ترجیح محیط به‌عنوان متغیر واسطه‌ای بر میزان سلامت نتیجه‌ی معکوس داشت. به‌طوری‌که کاهش ترجیحات محیط، منجر به افزایش سلامت روان گردید.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Examining the Impact of Environmental Characteristics on the Self-Rated Mental Health of Residents by Utilizing an Intermediate Variable of Environmental Preferences

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mitra Faraji 1
  • Raheleh Rostami 2
  • Maryam Shabak 2

1 PhD Candidate, Department of architecture, Sari Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sari, Iran)

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Architecture, Sari Branch , Islamic Azad University, Sari, Iran

چکیده [English]

 
The phenomenon of global urbanization is currently undergoing rapid advancements. This scholarly study aims to contribute to the discourse surrounding mental health promotion and the revitalization of urban neighborhoods within the framework of urban planning in Iran. Within this context, the examination of environmental characteristics is of utmost importance due to their substantial impact on mental well-being. This study sought to investigate the individual effects of various environmental characteristics on the overall health of citizens, as well as explore the role of environmental preferences as a mediating variable. Recognizing the influential role of urban environmental design on the mental health of individuals, this research was conducted with the objective of establishing a relationship between the perception of environmental variables and public mental health in residential neighborhoods, while also considering the mediating effect of environmental preferences among the population of Mazandaran. Data was collected via a questionnaire comprising two sections. The first section addressed mental health, utilizing a standardized questionnaire, whereas the second section assessed participants' perceptions of neighborhood characteristics, including security, amenities, aesthetics, and destinations, along with their environmental preferences. The application of structural equation modeling revealed a statistically significant influence of the participants' perception of environmental characteristics on mental health, with a corresponding decrease in mental health condition when environmental preferences were reduced.
 
 

Introduction

Modern lifestyles, accompanied by physical and mental challenges, pose significant threats to human well-being. Echoing the principles outlined in the World Health Organization's (WHO) constitution, which defines health as the state of complete physical, mental, and social well-being rather than the mere absence of disease or infirmity, it becomes evident that mental health can be influenced by perceptions of the surrounding environment. The subjective nature of perception, shaped by individual characteristics and environmental factors, underscores the role of residential environments in shaping the mental health and overall welfare of neighborhoods. Recognizing the intricate interplay between environmental perceptions and individual preferences, it becomes apparent that preferences are closely aligned with perceptions, and the evaluation of preferences is rooted in one's personal perception. Given the impact of environmental preferences on human mental health, it becomes crucial to identify and assess indicators of environmental preferences conducive to promoting well-being. To accomplish the primary objective of this research, the following inquiry must be addressed: How does the structural composition of residential environments relate to the mental health of residents in the Mazandaran Province's residential neighborhoods?

Literature Review

Research has indicated that the attributes of the natural environment hold significant relevance as predictors of health (Kruize et al., 2020). When examining residential environments, these encompass various elements such as amenities, accessibility, safety, visual appeal, and destinations (Giles-Corti & Donovan, 2002; Pikora, Giles-Corti, Bull, Jamrozik, & Donovan, 2003).
2.1. Influence of environmental factors on health
Individuals' preferences exert a considerable influence on their perceptions. Furthermore, the combined effects of a residential neighborhood characterized by well-designed streets and accessible public green spaces are known to impact an individual's perception and, consequently, their mental well-being. Research suggests that aesthetically pleasing landscapes can confer both physical and mental health benefits upon individuals (Ronghua Wang et al., 2021).
Numerous studies have explored the relationship between the physical environment and mental health, consistently revealing a direct correlation between one's mental well-being and the quality of their surroundings. It has been observed that individuals residing in areas marked by high levels of noise, traffic, derelict structures, and crime tend to experience heightened stress levels (Fong, Cruwys, Haslam, & Haslam, 2019). Studies examining the influence of the environment on health conditions can be broadly divided into four categories: (1) the impact of the environment on overall health, (2) the influence of the environment on mental health, (3) the effects of green spaces on health outcomes, and (4) the role of green environments in mitigating mental health issues and stress.

Methodology

The present study aims to explore the relationship between perceived neighborhood characteristics, such as safety, aesthetics, destination, and facilities, and their impact on mental health within residential areas. Additionally, this study seeks to investigate the mediating role of environmental preferences among individuals residing in Mazandaran Province. Data for this study was collected through a two-part questionnaire. The first part of the questionnaire assessed participants' health status using the standard questionnaire known as SF36, which provides a comprehensive assessment of health on a global scale. The second part of the questionnaire assessed participants' perceptions of neighborhood characteristics, including environmental preferences, safety, facilities, aesthetics, and destination. Structural equation modeling was employed to analyze the survey data collected from a sample of 450 residents.
Figure 1. Conceptual framework of the study
 

Conclusion

Numerous studies have highlighted the significant role of environmental perceptions in influencing individuals' mental health. Thus, the impact of the environment on mental well-being is undoubtedly substantial. Consequently, prioritizing security indicators, facilities, aesthetics, and destinations within the realm of environmental perception is highly recommended to enhance the overall mental health of community members. It is suggested that the provision of environmental factors preferred by residents be given due consideration in efforts to improve population health. By understanding people's preferences, effective measures can be taken to mitigate mental health risks associated with rapid urbanization in urban areas.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Mental Health
  • Environmental Factors
  • Perception
  • Environmental Preferences
 
حافظ نیا، محمدرضا. (1401).  مقدمهای بر روش تحقیق در علوم انسانی، تهران: سمت.
مرکز آمار ایران. (1395). سرشماری نفوس و مسکن، تهران. روابط عمومی و همکاری‌های بین‌المللی.
منتظری، علی.، گشتاسبی، آزیتا.، وحدانی نیا، مریم السادات. (1384). «ترجمه، تعیین پایایی و روایی گونه فارسی ابزار استاندارد SF-36»،  فصلنامه پایش، دوره پنج، شماره1: 49-56.
References
Althaus, S. L. (1998). Information effects in collective preferences. American Political Science Review, 92 (3), 545-558.
Bailis, D. S., Segall, A., & Chipperfield, J. G. (2003). Two views of self-rated general health status. Social science & medicine, 56 (2), 203-217.
Bilger, M., & Carrieri, V. (2013). Health in the cities: when the neighborhood matters more than income. Journal of Health Economics, 32 (1), 1-11.
Bjerke, T., Østdahl, T., Thrane, C., & Strumse, E. (2006). Vegetation density of urban parks and perceived appropriateness for recreation. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 5 (1), 35-44.
Bunda, K., & Busseri, M. A. (2019). Lay theories of health, self-rated health, and health behavior intentions. Journal of health psychology, 24 (7), 979-988.
Cai, K., Huang, W., & Lin, G. (2022). Bridging landscape preference and landscape design: A study on the preference and optimal combination of landscape elements based on conjoint analysis. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 73, 127615.
Chandrappa, R., & Das, D. B. (2021). Air Pollution Control. In Environmental Health - Theory and Practice: Volume 2: Coping with Environmental Health (pp. 127-140). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
De Vries, S., van Dillen, S. M. E., Groenewegen, P. P., & Spreeuwenberg, P. (2013). Streetscape greenery and health: Stress, social cohesion and physical activity as mediators. Social science & medicine, 94, 26-33. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.06.030
Diener, E., Sandvik, E., & Pavot, W. (2009). Happiness is the frequency, not the intensity, of positive versus negative affect. In Assessing well-being (pp. 213-231): Springer.
Diez Roux, A. V., & Mair, C. (2010). Neighborhoods and health. Annals of the New York academy of sciences, 1186 (1), 125-145.
Evans, G. W. (2003). The built environment and mental health. Journal of urban health, 80 (4), 536-555.
Farahani, L. M., & Maller, C. J. (2018). Perceptions and preferences of urban greenspaces: a literature review and framework for policy and practice. Landscape Online, 61, 1-22.
Ferraro, K. F., Farmer, M. M., & Wybraniec, J. A. (1997). Health trajectories: long-term dynamics among black and white adults. Journal of health and Social Behavior, 38-54.
Finch, B. K., Do, D. P., Heron, M., Bird, C., Seeman, T., & Lurie, N. (2010). Neighborhood effects on health: concentrated advantage and disadvantage. Health & Place, 16 (5), 1058-1060.
Fong, P., Cruwys, T., Haslam, C., & Haslam, S. A. (2019). Neighbourhood identification and mental health: How social identification moderates the relationship between socioeconomic disadvantage and health. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 61, 101-114.
Gifford, R. (2007). Environmental psychology: Principles and practice.
Giles-Corti, B., & Donovan, R. J. (2002). The relative influence of individual, social and physical environment determinants of physical activity. Social science & medicine, 54 (12), 1793-1812.
Haight, B. L., & Busseri, M. A. (2021). Examining the implications of perceiving one’s future health as a goal or a standard for affect, motivation, and health behaviour. Motivation and Emotion, 45 (4), 473-488.
Hartig, T., & Staats, H. (2006). The need for psychological restoration as a determinant of environmental preferences. Journal of environmental psychology, 26 (3), 215-226.
Idler, E. L., & Benyamini, Y. (1997). Self-rated health and mortality: a review of twenty-seven community studies. Journal of health and social behavior, 21-37.
Jahani, A., & Saffariha, M. (2020). Aesthetic preference and mental restoration prediction in urban parks: An application of environmental modeling approach. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 54, 126775.
Kaplan, S., Fitzpatrick, G., & Docherty, M. (1982). Cognition and environment.
Kłopotowska, A. (2017). Tactile Architectural Models as Universal ‘Urban Furniture’. Paper presented at the IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering.
Knutsson, U., Dahlgren, J., Marcus, C., Rosberg, S., Brönnegård, M., Stierna, P., & Albertsson-Wikland, K. (1997). Circadian cortisol rhythms in healthy boys and girls: relationship with age, growth, body composition, and pubertal development. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 82 (2), 536-540.
Kruize, H., van Kamp, I., van den Berg, M., van Kempen, E., Wendel-Vos, W., Ruijsbroek, A.,... Smith, G. (2020). Exploring mechanisms underlying the relationship between the natural outdoor environment and health and well-being–Results from the PHENOTYPE project. Environment international, 134, 105173.
Landrigan, P. J., & Fuller, R. (2015). Global health and environmental pollution. In (Vol. 60, pp. 761-762): Springer.
Lang, J. (1987). Creating architectural theory. The role of the behavioral sciences in environmental. design.
Lo, A. Y., & Jim, C. Y. (2010). Willingness of residents to pay and motives for conservation of urban green spaces in the compact city of Hong Kong. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 9 (2), 113-120. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2010.01.001
Malmström, M., Sundquist, J., & Johansson, S.-E. (1999). Neighborhood environment and self-reported health status: a multilevel analysis. American Journal of Public Health, 89 (8), 1181-1186.
Mouratidis, K. (2020). Neighborhood characteristics, neighborhood satisfaction, and well-being: The links with neighborhood deprivation. Land Use Policy, 99, 104886.
Nasar, J. L. (2008). Assessing perceptions of environments for active living. American journal of preventive medicine, 34 (4), 357-363.
Nesbitt, L., Meitner, M. J., Girling, C., Sheppard, S. R., & Lu, Y. (2019). Who has access to urban vegetation? A spatial analysis of distributional green equity in 10 US cities. Landscape and Urban Planning, 181, 51-79.
Pikora, T., Giles-Corti, B., Bull, F., Jamrozik, K., & Donovan, R. (2003). Developing a framework for assessment of the environmental determinants of walking and cycling. Social science & medicine, 56 (8), 1693-1703.
Poortinga, W., Dunstan, F. D., & Fone, D. L. (2008). Neighbourhood deprivation and self-rated health: the role of perceptions of the neighbourhood and of housing problems. Health & Place, 14 (3), 562-575.
Scott, A. (2003). Assessing public perception of landscape: from practice to policy. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 5 (2), 123-144.
Song, Y., Gee, G. C., Fan, Y., & Takeuchi, D. T. (2007). Do physical neighborhood characteristics matter in predicting traffic stress and health outcomes? Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 10 (2), 164-176.
Stigsdotter, U. K., Ekholm, O., Schipperijn, J., Toftager, M., Kamper-Jørgensen, F., & Randrup, T. B. (2010). Health promoting outdoor environments-Associations between green space, and health, health-related quality of life and stress based on a Danish national representative survey. Scandinavian journal of public health, 38 (4), 411-417.
Stokols, D. (1978). Environmental psychology. Annual review of psychology, 29 (1), 253-295.
Swanwick, C. (2009). Society's attitudes to and preferences for land and landscape. Land use policy, 26, S62-S75.
Teychenne, M., White, R. L., Richards, J., Schuch, F. B., Rosenbaum, S., & Bennie, J. A. (2020). Do we need physical activity guidelines for mental health: What does the evidence tell us? Mental Health and Physical Activity, 18, 100315.
Van Ham, M., & Manley, D. (2012). Neighbourhood effects research at a crossroads. Ten challenges for future research introduction. Environment and Planning A, 44 (12), 2787-2793.
W.H.O, O. (2010). Global Recommendations on Physical Activity for Health Geneva. Retrieved from Geneva: World Health Organisation:
Wang, R. (2018). Tracking “Choice” in the Housing Choice Voucher Program: The Relationship Between Neighborhood Preference and Locational Outcome. Urban Affairs Review, 54 (2), 302-331. doi:10.1177/1078087416646205
Wang, R., Jiang, W., & Lu, T. (2021). Landscape characteristics of university campus in relation to aesthetic quality and recreational preference. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 66, 127389. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127389
Wu, L., Dong, Q., Luo, S., Jiang, W., Hao, M., & Chen, Q. (2021). Effects of Spatial Elements of Urban Landscape Forests on the Restoration Potential and Preference of Adolescents. Land, 10 (12), 1349. Retrieved from https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/12/1349
Yang, G., Yu, Z., Zhang, J., & Søderkvist Kristensen, L. (2021). From preference to landscape sustainability: a bibliometric review of landscape preference research from 1968 to 2019. Ecosystem Health and Sustainability, 7 (1), 1948355.
Zhang, L., Zhou, S., & Kwan, M.-P. (2019). A comparative analysis of the impacts of objective versus subjective neighborhood environment on physical, mental, and social health. Health & Place, 59, 102170. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2019.102170
 References [In Persian]
Iran Statistics Center. (2016). Population and Housing Census, Tehran. Public relations and international cooperation. [In Persian]
Hafeznia, M. (2022). An Introduction to the Research Method in Humanities. tehran: samt. [In Persian]
Montazeri, A., Goshtasbi, A., & Vahdaninia, M. (2006). The Short Form Health Survey (SF-36): translation and validation study of the Iranian version. payesh,5 (1) 49-56. [In Persian]
 
استناد به این مقاله: فرجی، میترا.، رستمی، راحله.، شباک، مریم. (1402). تأثیر ویژگی‌های محیط محله بر سلامت روان با تکیه بر متغیر واسطه‌ای ترجیحات ساکنین،  فصلنامه برنامه‌ریزی توسعه شهری و منطقه‌ای، 8 (27)، 133 -162.
DOI: 10.22054/urdp.2023.72065.1519
 Urban and Regional Development Planning  is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License...