Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, of Urban Planning, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

2 MSc in Transportation Planning and Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran

3 Ph.D in Transportation Planning and Engineering, Tarbiat Modarres University, Tehran, Iran.

4 Assistant Professor of Urban and Design Planning, Road, Housing and Urban Development Research Center (BHRC), Tehran, Iran

5 Master of Highway Engineering, Iran University Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

 
In recent years, there has been a growing trend in utilizing the Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) approach for updating traditional master plans. This article presents a comprehensive framework for evaluating development plans through the lens of TOD principles. The assessment is based on five key criteria: density, diversity, design, destination accessibility, and distance to transit, as well as the interrelationships between these factors. To provide a realistic representation of these principles in the neighborhood context, a dynamic zoning system is employed in walkable areas for local residents. By using this framework, the strengths and weaknesses of development plans can be thoroughly evaluated in detail. The evaluation outcomes consist of statistical figures and geographic maps that can be used to improve future development plans. In this study, the Neyshabour master plan was assessed using this method, revealing that the city's planning and design do not conform to TOD principles. The majority of the TOD criteria received low scores, highlighting the need for revisions to the master plan.
Keywords: Evaluation, Transit Oriented Development (TOD), Urban Development Plan, Density, Diversity, Design.
 
 

Introduction

Over the last few decades, cities have grown in size due to urbanization, leading to problems such as increased traffic congestion and air pollution. Transit-oriented development (TOD) has been proposed as a solution to these issues. TOD involves developing more compact, mixed-use, and high-density urban areas near transit stations, with high-quality pedestrian networks and reduced parking spaces, in order to decrease reliance on private cars for intra-city trips and encourage walking.
By examining the experiences of countries that have implemented TOD principles, planners can adjust their plans to align with TOD principles and dimensions. This paper identifies the most significant sources for the principles of such developments and extracts them for use in evaluating comprehensive urban plans based on TOD principles. The information provided in a country's comprehensive plans is then used to evaluate these principles and incorporate the results into a method for evaluating urban development plans, with a particular focus on small and medium-sized cities, which make up 98% of the nation's cities.
As a case study, the master plan for the city of Neyshabur is analyzed to determine whether the incorporation of public transportation aligns with the TOD approach. The further development of this method will be made available to urban planners so that they can use it as an auxiliary instrument.

Methodology

The proposed method for evaluating urban development plans in this study was developed using five dimensions chosen from the TOD criteria: "density," "diversity," "design," "access to destinations," and "distance to public transportation." To automate the evaluation process, coding in the GIS environment was used for geographic analysis, and a web application was developed for index calculation. As urban development plans are prepared as GIS layers, supplementary software-based tools are also provided for associated analyses and preparations.
After conducting an analysis of the strata that make up the urban development plan, indicators associated with the TOD approach are extracted and organized into a database at the city cell level. In addition to these five dimensions, the relationship between the criteria is considered through combined criteria, with one hundred points assigned to sixteen different criteria according to this guideline.
Overall, this method provides an efficient and effective means of evaluating urban development plans based on TOD principles. The automated nature of the tool, supported by GIS and web application technology, streamlines the evaluation process while ensuring accuracy and consistency.

Results

After extracting all the criteria and determining the score for each, the proposed method provides a more comprehensive representation of urban development plans, highlighting their strengths and weaknesses. This analysis generates statistical charts and maps that demonstrate the geographical distribution of various factors, which can be utilized to improve urban development plans. For instance, if there is inadequate access to public systems, it must be determined which areas of the city require more attention and redesigning. Similarly, regions of the city that require an improvement or modification of the built environment are also identified and displayed. This relates to the relationship between permitted building density and other design elements based on public transportation.
Moreover, the use of Lorenz curves and accessibility of various services at different functional levels can assist in balancing the distribution of these types of uses throughout the city, ensuring equal access for all citizens. However, the "distance to public transportation" remains a significant limitation of this approach. Insufficient investment in developing public transportation systems within comprehensive plans means that urban development and environmentally responsible transportation are currently incompatible with each other.

Conclusion

The aim of this study is to examine the correlation between physical factors and a development strategy that relies on public transportation. Upon completion, an inquiry into the impact of non-physical variables on development plans based on public transportation can also be conducted. These non-physical variables encompass environmental, seismic zoning, economic, demographic, and climatic factors.


Keywords

 

امین‌زاده، بهناز؛ رودکی، سمیه. (1395)، «ارائه روشی تلفیقی برای ارزیابی طرح‌های تفصیلی شهری (مطالعه موردی: طرح تفصیلی منطقه ۶ شهرداری شیراز)»، هویت شهر، 11(1)، 29-42.‎
دبیرخانه شورای عالی شهرسازی و معماری ایران. (1383)، مجموعه مصوبات شورای عالی شهرسازی و معماری ایران، دبیرخانه شورای عالی شهرسازی و معماری ایران.
رحمانی، مهرداد؛ امین زاده گوهرریزی، بهرام؛ رستگار، سعید و امین زاده گوهرریزی، بابک. (1399)، «ارزیابی تطبیقی مبانی الگوی توسعه پیشنهادی طرح ساختاری راهبردی (جامع) شهر تهران 1386 با الگوی توسعه حمل‌ونقل عمومی محور (TOD)» جغرافیا و توسعه فضای شهری، 7 (2)، 207-187.
امین‌زاده گوهرریزی، بهرام؛ جبارزاده، آرمین؛ رستگار، سعید؛ رحمانی، مهرداد و امین‌زاده گوهرریزی، بابک. (1398)، «بهینه‌سازی یکپارچه تخصیص تراکم و کاربری زمین و طراحی شبکه حمل‌ونقل عمومی-موردپژوهی: منطقه 22 تهران»،  فصلنامه مهندسی حمل‌ونقل، 11 (1)، 181-199.
رحمانی، مهرداد؛ رستگار، سعید؛ امین‌زاده گوهرریزی، بهرام؛ نوری، شیوا و امین‌زاده گوهرریزی، بابک. (1397)، «ارائه یک مدل برنامه‌ریزی ریاضی با اهداف چندگانه برای اصلاح سازوکار تخصیص تراکم سکونت و فعالیت طرح جامع به‌منظور بیشینه‌سازی انطباق با اصول توسعه حمل‌ونقل عمومی محور- مطالعه موردی: منطقه 12 تهران»، مطالعات شهری، 7 (28)، 17-28.
سازمان برنامه‌وبودجه. (1369)، قرارداد تهیه طرح‌های توسعه و عمران حوزه نفوذ و تفصیلی شهرها (قرارداد تیپ شماره 12).
دبیرخانه شورای عالی شهرسازی و معماری ایران. (1400)، چارچوب، راهنما و شرح خدمات تهیه طرح‌های جامع شهری با نگرش و روش نوین.
مرکز آمار ایران. (1395)، اطلاعات سرشماری عمومی نفوس و مسکن.
معاونت معماری و شهرسازی شهرداری تهران. (1399)، مطالعات ارزیابی و آسیب‌شناسی طرح تفصیلی شهر تهران و ارائه الگوی بازنگری.
وزارت راه و شهرسازی. (1394)، طرح جامع شهر نیشابور.
آزادى، محیا؛ کرمانشاهی، شهاب‌الدین و مؤمنی، مریم. (1396)، «ارزیابی محلات شهری از منظر تطابق با اصول توسعه مبتنی بر حمل‌ونقل همگانی نمونة موردمطالعه: کوی نصر تهران»، صفه، 27(3)، 61-74.‎
میرمقتدایی، مهتا و حق‌شناس، ساناز. (1400)، «مروری بر بومی‌سازی سیاست توسعه مبتنی بر حمل‌و‌نقل همگانی در ایران، از نظریه تا عمل»، مهندسی ساختمان و علوم مسکن، 14(1)، 31-42.‎
میرمقتدایی، مهتا؛ حق‌وردیان، فاطمه و صلاحی مقدم، آرسام (1399)، «راهنمای توسعه شهری مبتنی بر حمل‌ونقل همگانی (برای شهرهای میانی)»، نشریه شماره گ - 912، مرکز تحقیقات راه، مسکن و شهرسازی.
وزارت راه و شهرسازی، (1401)، دستورالعمل ارزیابی طرح‌ توسعه و عمران شهری مطابق با اصول توسعه مبتنی بر حمل‌ونقل همگانی (TOD)، انتشارات مرکز تحقیقات راه، مسکن و شهرسازی.
 
References
Bertolini, Luca. (1999). “Spatial development patterns and public transport: the application of an analytical model in the Netherlands.” Planning Practice and Research, 14(2), 199-210.
Curtis, Carey, John L. Renne, and Luca Bertolini, (Eds.). (2009). Transit Oriented Development: Making it Happen. Ashgate Publishing Limited, Surrey.
Calthorpe, Peter. (1993). The next American metropolis: Ecology, community, and the American dream. Princeton architectural press.
Ibraeva, Anna, Gonçalo Homem de Almeida Correia, Cecília Silva, and António Pais Antunes. (2020). “Transit-oriented development: A review of research achievements and challenges.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 132, 110-130.
Jamme, Huê-Tâm, Janet Rodriguez, Deepak Bahl, and Tridib Banerjee. (2019). “A twenty-five-year biography of the TOD concept: from design to policy, planning, and implementation.” Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(4), 409-428.‏
Cervero, Robert, and Danielle Dai. (2014). “BRT TOD: Leveraging transit oriented development with bus rapid transit investments.” Transport Policy, 36, 127-138.
Cervero, Robert., & Kara Kockelman. (1997). “Travel demand and the 3Ds: Density, diversity, and design.” Transportation research. Part D, Transport and environment, 2(3), 199-219.
Chatman, Daniel G. (2013). “Does TOD need the T? Auto use, residential sorting, and access to rail.” Transportation Research Board 92nd Annual Meeting (No. 13-5164).
Council, U. G. B. (2009). LEED for neighborhood development. a prescription for green healthy communities. Available at: http://www. greenhomeguide. org/living green/led_for_neighborhood_ development. html. Accessed March, 15.
Delhi Development Authority. (2001). Master Plan of Delhi.
Ewing, Reid, and Robert Cervero. (2010). “Travel and the built environment: A meta-analysis.” Journal of the American planning association, 76(3), 265-294.
Geurs, Karst T., and Bert van Wee. (2004). ” Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: review and research directions.” Journal of Transport geography, 12(2), 127-140.
Handy, Susan. (1993). “Regional versus local accessibility: Implications for nonwork travel.” Transportation Research Record, 58-66.
Institute for Transportation & Development Policy, TOD Standard version 3.0, New York, NY, 2017.
Kamruzzaman, Md., Douglas Baker, Simon Washington, and, Gavin Turrell. (2014). “Advance transit oriented development typology: Case study in brisbane, Australia.” Journal of Transport Geography, 34, 54–70.
Litman, Todd, and Rowan Steele. (2012). Land use impacts on transport. Canada: Victoria Transport Policy Institute..
Malaitham, Sathita, Fukuda, Atsushi, Vichiensan, Varameth, and Wasuntarasook, Vasinee. (2016). “Measuring Pedestrian Environment in Term of Connectivity Under Catchment Area of TOD in Developing Country: Case of Bangkok, Thailand.” In Transportation Research Board 95th Annual Meeting (No. 16-4789).
Sung, Hyungun, and Ju-Taek Oh. (2011). “Transit-oriented development in a high-density city: Identifying its association with transit ridership in Seoul, Korea.” Cities, 28(1), 70-82.
Valley Connections. (2001). Model Transit-Oriented District Overlay Zoning Ordinance.
Jang, Seongman, Youngsoo An, Changhyo Yi and Seungil Lee. (2017). “Assessing the spatial equity of Seoul’s public transportation using the Gini coefficient based on its accessibility.” International Journal of Urban Sciences, 21 (1), 91-107.
Mirmoghtadaee, Mahta, and Mohammad Hamed Abdi. (2021). “A National Guideline for Transit-Oriented Development: Challenges and Prospects for the Iranian Edition.” Space Ontology International Journal, 10(1), 1-15. http://todanalytics.racinsoft.ir/
References [In Persian]
Aminzade, Behnaz and Somayeh Roodaki. (2017). “An Integrated Method for Assessments of Detailed Plans by Using Plan Process Result (PPR) and Process Policy-Plan/Program Implementation (PPIP) (Case Study: Region 6 of Shiraz Detailed Plan).” Hoviatshahr, 11(1), 29-42 [In Persian].
Secretariat of the Supreme Council of Urban Planning and Architecture of Iran. (2004). Collection of approvals of the Supreme Council of Urban Planning and Architecture of Iran [In Persian].
Rahmani, Mehrdad, Bahram Aminzadeh Goharrizi, Saeed Rastegar, and Babak Aminzadeh Goharrizi. (2020). “Comparative Analysis of the Proposed Development Model in Tehran Strategic-Structural Master Plan (2007) using Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Model.” Journal of Geography and Urban Space Development, 7(2), 187-207 [In Persian].
Aminzadeh Goharrizi, Bahram, Armin Jabbarzadeh, Saeed Rastegar, Mehrdad Rahmani and Babak Aminzadeh Goharrizi. (2019). “Integrated Land-Use Allocation and Transit Network Design Problem -Case Study: Tehran’s 22nd Region.” Journal of Transportation Engineering, 11(1), 181-199 [In Persian].
Rahmani, Mehrdad, Saeed Rastegar, Bahram Aminzadeh Goharrizi, Shiva Nouri, and Babak Aminzadeh Goharrizi. (2018). “A proposal model for residential density and distribution of activity compatible with TOD (Case study: District 12 of Tehran).“ Motaleate Shahri, 7(28), 17-28 [In Persian].
 Plan and Budget Organization. (1990). The contract for the preparation of master plans of the cities [In Persian].
Secretariat of the Supreme Council of Urban Planning and Architecture of Iran. (2021). The framework, guide and description of services for the preparation of comprehensive urban plans with a new approach and method [In Persian].
Statistical Centre of Iran. (2016). National Population and Housing Census [In Persian].
Deputy of Architecture and Urban Planning of Tehran Municipality. (2020). Evaluation studies of the detailed plan of Tehran city and providing a revision model [In Persian].
Ministry of Roads & Urban Development of Iran. (2015). Comprehensive plan of Neyshabur [In Persian].
 Azadi, Mahya, Shahab Kermanshahi, and Maryam Momeni. (2017). “Evaluation of urban neighborhoods from the point of view of compliance with the principles of Transit Oreinted Development (Case study: koye Nasr, Tehran).” Soffeh, 27(3), 61-74 [In Persian].
Mirmoghtadaee, Mahta and Sanaz Haghshenas. (2021). “Localization of Transit-Oriented Development Policy in Iran, from Concept to Reality.” Building Engineering and Housing Science, 14(1), 31-42 [In Persian].
Mirmoghtadaee, Mahta, Fetemeh Haghverdian, Arsam Salahi Moghadam. (2020). Guideline for transit oriented development for mediumsized cities, BHRC Publication No.R:912 [In Persian].
Ministry of Roads & Urban Development of Iran. (2022). Manual for Evaluating Urban Development Plans in accordance with Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) Principles [In Persian].
 
استناد به این مقاله: کرمانشاهی، شهاب‌الدین.، رامندی، علیرضا.، بشیری‌نیا، مهدی.، مهدی، شکرگذار.، میرمقتدایی، مهتا. (1402). ارائه روشی برای ارزیابی طرح‌های جامع شهری از دریچه ابعاد توسعه مبتنی بر حمل‌ونقل همگانی (مطالعه موردی: طرح جامع شهر نیشابور)،  فصلنامه برنامه‌ریزی توسعه شهری و منطقه‌ای، 8(25)، 1-41.
DOI: 10.22054/urdp.2023.67998.1453
 Urban and Regional Development Planning  is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License...