Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 M.A of urban planning, University of Art, Tehran, Iran

2 Associate Professor , Department of Urban Planning, Tehran Central Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

3 PhD Candidate in Architecture, Hamadan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Hamadan, Iran

Abstract

 
Walking constitutes a fundamental activity and pedestrians play a vital role in the vitality of urban spaces. This research endeavor aims to conduct a comparative analysis of walkability between Tehran's Takhti and Marzdaran neighborhoods while validating the findings and comparing specialized models. The assessment of data and the comparative examination of the two neighborhoods were carried out utilizing three quantitative models: WalkScore, Smartraq, and SpaceSyntax. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS LISREL software. The research methodology employed was descriptive, analytical, and survey-based, representing an applied approach. The statistical population encompassed 250 residents from both neighborhoods. The analysis of pedestrian circulation models revealed that the Takhti neighborhood attained a WalkScore rating of 93.07%, achieved a connectivity index of 1.76 in the Space Syntax model, and exhibited three positive Z-scores in the Smartraq model. Conversely, the Marzdaran neighborhood obtained a WalkScore rating of 77.86%, recorded a connectivity index of 1.69 in the Space Syntax model, and displayed three negative Z-scores in the Smartraq model. By evaluating these outcomes and subjecting them to statistical analyses, encompassing the examination of performance, physical, social, and environmental criteria, it becomes evident that the Takhti neighborhood, with an average score of 3.52, exhibits a superior capability for walkability compared to the Marzdaran neighborhood, which achieved an average score of 2.40. These results reinforce the quantitative model findings regarding walkability in the Takhti neighborhood.
 

Introduction

The absence of pedestrian presence in local areas and the subsequent decline in neighborhood walkability have adverse effects on security, safety, and social interactions. These issues are further compounded by environmental concerns like air and noise pollution, public health implications, anonymity of neighborhood spaces, a lack of community belonging, and the resulting physical fatigue. Therefore, obtaining a comprehensive understanding of the current situation is vital for informed decision-making. To address these challenges, it is crucial for urban designers and planners to evaluate and measure the walkability of neighborhoods. This enables them to transform the urban environment, creating a pedestrian-friendly atmosphere that enhances the quality of walking in cities today. This research aims to assess and analyze the local walkability in two neighborhoods in Tehran, employing the WalkScore, Smartraq, and space syntax methods. By comparing the outcomes of these approaches, the study provides a comprehensive analysis of the walkability status within the selected neighborhoods. Furthermore, the research employs statistical analysis to validate the findings obtained from these models. This rigorous examination ensures the reliability and accuracy of the results. Ultimately, the study will propose recommendations that not only highlight the advantages and limitations of the utilized models but also present a neighborhood pattern that prioritizes pedestrian needs and activities.

Literature Review

By conducting a thorough literature review of previous studies and research pertaining to walkability, with a specific focus on measurement and assessment, it becomes apparent that there are noticeable deficiencies and erroneous approaches in the domestic research landscape. These shortcomings are particularly evident when it comes to result validation. While international research has diligently addressed methodological challenges, there is a dearth of investigation into the validation of these methods using questionnaire data in distinct localities. The necessity of undertaking this research lies in the imperative to introduce effective models for evaluating the state of local walkability. Additionally, it is crucial to validate the outcomes generated by these models and establish comparative analyses to discern their respective strengths and weaknesses. This rigorous examination is integral to unearthing the merits and limitations of each model, thus contributing to the advancement of knowledge in the field.

Methodology

This study adopts an applied research approach with a combined framework that incorporates both survey-based statistical analysis and descriptive-analytical data analysis methods. The research procedure, data collection, and analysis can be classified into two categories: quantitative and qualitative. Quantitative measures, assessment tools, and statistical techniques were employed to analyze the collected data, while a qualitative approach employing comparative techniques was utilized to compare two specific neighborhoods. Multiple methods were utilized to assess and comparatively analyze the walkability status of the studied neighborhoods. These methods include WalkScore, Smartraq, and space syntax models, each focusing on different dimensions of walkability. The analysis for WalkScore and Smartraq was performed using ArcGIS software, and a customized Python algorithm was developed and executed for the WalkScore method. For space syntax analysis, DepthMap software was employed. In the following section, statistical analysis was carried out to validate the outcomes derived from these models. This serves two purposes: enhancing the credibility of the models and confirming the reliability of the results in practical applications. This research falls under the comparative research category. The statistical population comprised residents residing in the Takhti and Marzdaran neighborhoods, with a randomly selected sample of 250 individuals.

Results

Based on the analysis conducted using the space syntax method, the findings reveal that the Takhti neighborhood exhibits a higher level of walkability quality compared to the Marzdaran neighborhood. This conclusion is supported by the evaluation of two critical indicators related to walkability in space syntax: connectivity and integration.
Table 1




Indicator


Neighborhood


Max


Min


Average






Integration


Takhti


3.21


0.84


1.75




Marzdaran


3.48


0.87


1.69




Connectivity


Takhti


30


1


3.5




Marzdaran


21


1


4.5




Intensity


Takhti


1.2


0.32


0.69




Marzdaran


1.25


0.42


0.79




Mean Depth


Takhti


7.82


2.79


4.47




Marzdaran


6.31


2.33


3.9n




The findings derived from the WalkScore method indicate that the residential blocks located within the Takhti neighborhood consistently exhibit significantly higher average scores in comparison to those situated within the Marzdaran neighborhood. These scores were formulated based on the proximity of each residential block to local amenities, encapsulating an essential aspect of neighborhood livability.
Table2




Neighborhood


Total Units


St.diversion


Interval Walkscore
Point


Average
Walkscore
point




Min


Max






Takhti


3070


0.16


85.87


98.92


93.07




Marzdaran


2742


0.73


43.75


97.91


77.86




The application of a method known as Smartraq brought to light notable disparities between the Takhti and Marzdaran neighborhoods in terms of intersection density, residential block density, and land use mix index. The findings indicate that the Takhti neighborhood exhibits a substantially higher magnitude in these metrics in comparison to its counterpart, the Marzdaran neighborhood.
Table 3




Neighborhood


Area
(m2)


intersections


Nodes


intersection index (per m2)


households


Residential Units Area (m2)


Residential density


Commercial land use area (m2)


Office land use area(m2)


Residential land use area (m2)


land use mix indices






Takhti


665946


419


307


6.29


7008


471821


0.018


140553


45604


371821


0.348




Marzdaran


1609772


311


293


1.93


10948


937252


0.011


62697


40771


937252


0.223




This research endeavors to employ rigorous statistical analyses in order to systematically investigate and substantiate the walkability attributes of the two focal neighborhoods, while simultaneously corroborating the results obtained from three distinct walkability models. Notably, regression analysis has effectively demonstrated that the aforementioned components decisively account for approximately 75% of the walkability variance discernible within the Takhti and Marzdaran neighborhoods.
 
 
The outcomes derived from regression analyses and the comparison of mean values derived from the perceptions of neighborhood residents pertaining to walkability indices convincingly illustrate that the Takhti neighborhood, boasting an average score of 3.52, exhibits a considerably higher level of walkability in comparison to the Marzdaran neighborhood, whose average rating stands at a modest 2.40.
Table 4




Indicates


Neighborhood


 


Statistics




n


Mean


Median


Mode


s.d


Var






Functional


Takhti


125


3.8


3.75


3.5


0.54


0.29




Marzdaran


125


2.20


2.32


2.3


0.43


0.48




Physical


Takhti


125


3.71


3.5


3.61


0.52


0.27




Marzdaran


125


2.53


2.12


2.75


0.62


0.39




Social


Takhti


125


4.12


4


4


0.54


0.32




Marzdaran


125


2.64


2.37


2.25


0.68


0.46




Environment


Takhti


125


2.46


2.25


2.25


0.83


0.69




Marzdaran


125


2.24


2.3


2.5


0.68


0.38




Total


Takhti


125


3.52


3.15


3.26


0.91


0.99




Marzdaran


125


2.40


2.90


2.75


0.663


0.441





Conclusion

In conclusion, the synthesis of findings arising from the WalkScore, Smartraq, and Spaces syntax methods has yielded valuable insights into the strengths and limitations of each approach within the assessment framework. Based on the comprehensive analysis, it can be deduced that all three models have demonstrated efficacy, with their outcomes exhibiting notable congruity. However, none of these methods in isolation can be deemed adequate for a holistic evaluation of neighborhood walkability. Therefore, it is advisable to combine these methodologies to achieve a more comprehensive assessment of pedestrian environments.
Unanimously, all three models concur on the walkability of the Takhti neighborhood, renowned for its historical character, intricate urban fabric, diverse land uses, and abundant amenities. Notably, this neighborhood excels across various indicators of walkability, encompassing ease of access to facilities, a mix of land uses, safety measures, population density, residential density, intersection density, continuity of networks, and street connectivity. As corroborated by the models, Takhti emerges as a notably pedestrian-friendly environment, diligently addressing the diverse needs of pedestrians, in stark contrast to the recently developed Marzdaran neighborhood.
Acknowledgments
The authors express their sincere gratitude to all individuals who have played a role in the conception and execution of this scholarly article.
 
 

Keywords

Main Subjects

 
پوراحمد، احمد.، مراد پور، نبی.، حاتمی نژاد، حسین. (1397). بررسی تأثیر ابعاد کالبدی فضایی بر پیاده مداری در شهر تهران (نمونه موردی: محلات امیرآباد و دانشگاه تهران). نشریه تحقیقات کاربردی علوم جغرافیایی سال هجدهم. شماره 51. زمستان 97.
پورسرتیپ، فریناز. (1389). پیاده راه: تحکیم رابطه انسان و محیط شهری. جستارهای شهری، 29-35.
ثقفی اصل، آرش. (1389). پیاده مداری گامی به‌سوی شبکه کارآمد حمل‌ونقل شهر پایدار. تفکر معماری، 15-22.
جباری، منا. (1388). پیاده مداری در شهر. ماهنامه بین‌المللی راه و ساختمان، 70-77.
حبیبی، کیومرث.، بهزادفر، مصطفی.، جابری، آیرین. (1390). پیاده راه، محرک توسعه در بافت کهن شهری. ویژه‌نامه منظر مرکز مطالعات و برنامه‌ریزی شهر تهران.
شهابیان، پویان.، بی‌آزار، بهاره. (1394). بررسی ویژگی‌ها و تحلیل فضاهای پیاده رهوار با استفاده از شیوه واک اسکور (نمونه موردی محله گل‌ها تهران). تهران: پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد دانشگاه آزاد تهران مرکز.
شهابیان، پویان.، لاهیجی، رومینا.، علی بخشی، رومینا.، علی بخشی، فاطمه. (1394). امکان‌سنجی قابلیت پیاده رهواری در معابر شهری با تلفیق سه روش. صفه شماره 39, 37-52.
ظریف پور لنگرودی، آناهیتا.، البرزی، فریبا.، سهیلی، جمال‌الدین. (1401). بررسی نماهای خیابان‌های شهری از منظر ادراک شهروندان (نمونه موردی: پیاده راه 15 خرداد، تهران). نشریه تحقیقات کاربردی علوم جغرافیایی، سال بیست و دوم، شماره 66 پاییز 1401.
عباس زاده، شهاب.، تمری، سودا. (1391). بررسی و تحلیل مؤلفه‌های تأثیرگذار بر بهبود کیفیات فضایی پیاده راه‌ها به‌منظور افزایش سطح تعاملات اجتماعی؛ مطالعه موردی: محورهای تربیت و ولیعصر تبریز. مطالعات شهری، 1-10.
عماری، حسن. (1393). روان‌شناسی، شهر و زندگی روزمره. تهران: انتشارات تیسا.
فیضی، محمدجواد.، رجبی، آزیتا.، حسینی، یاسمین. (1391). بازشناخت جنبش پیاده مداری در پایداری فضاهای متراکم شهری. مدیریت شهری. 179-194.
گل، یان.،اسوار، بل. (2013). بررسی زندگی فضای عمومی (ترجمه: ایزدی، س؛ و محمدی، س؛ و خیبری، س، (1394)). تهران: مرکز مطالعات و تحقیقات شهرسازی و معماری ایران.
گل، یان. (2010). شهر انسانی (ترجمه: غفاری، ع؛ و غفاری، ل.(1392)). تهران: انتشارات موسسه علم معمار.
لطفی، صدیقه. (1391). بررسی نقش عوامل مصنوع در افزایش پیاده‌روی شهروندان در شهر؛ مطالعه موردی: شهر تهران. مطالعات شهری، 27-34.
مرکز آمار ایران. (1395). سرشماری نفوس و مسکن سال. تهران: مرکز آمار ایران.
معینی، محمدمهدی. (1394). شهرهای پیاده مدار. انتشارات آذرخش.
منشور نوشهرگرایی (ترجمه: دانش، علیرضا؛ و بصیری، رضا) (1387). تهران: انتشارات پردازش و برنامه‌ریزی شهری.
موسوی، سیدیعقوب. (1391). محله نوین، الگوی جامعه‌شناسی شهری از توسعه محله‌ای. منظر ویژه‌نامه مرکز مطالعات و برنامه‌ریزی شهرداری تهران، 67-73.
References
Abley, Steve. (2005). Walkability Scoping. Christchurch.
Aneshensel, Carol. (2002). Theory-Based Data Analysis for the Social Sciences. Thousand Oaks, California: Pine Forge Press.
Babiano, Mateo. (2016). Pedestrian's needs matters:Examining Manila's walking environment. Transport Policy, 107-115.
Barton, Hugh. (2000). Conflicting perceptions of neighborhood in barton. 3-18.
Burden, Dan. (2001). Building Communities with transportation. Transportation research record: Journal of the transportation research board,1773(1), 5-20.
Cortright, Joe. (2009). Walking The Walk: How Walkability Raises Home Values In US. CEos For The Cities.
Cowan, Robert(2005). The Dictionary Of Urbanism. Streetwise Press.
Dar Hwang, Liang. (2014). Association between objective measurement of walking activity and neighborhood walkability. University of Washington: A thesis Of Master oF science.
Fitzsimons, Lorraine. (2013). A multidisciplinary examination of walkability: Its concept, assessment and applicability. Dublin City University: for the award of PhD.
Frank, Lawrence, L. Schmid, Thomas., Sallis, James, Chapman, James, & Saelens, Brian (2005). Linking Objectively Measured Physical Activity with Objectively Measured Urban Form. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 117-125.
Front Seat Team (2015). Walkscore. Retrieved from Walkscore Methodology: https://www.walkscore.com/methodology.shtml
Jabari, Mona. (2008), "Pedestrian circulation in the city", International Monthly Road and Construction: 77-70.
Jenks, Mike, & Dempsey, Nicola (2007). Defining the neighbourhood. TRP, 153-177.
Jiang, Bin, Claramount, Christopher, & Bjorn, Klarqvist (2000). Integration of space syntax into GIS for modelling urban spaces. JAG, 161-171.
Jones, Lindsey (2010). Investigating Neighborhood Walkability and its Association with Physical Activity Levels and Body Composition of a Sample of Maryland Adolescent Girls, Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Maryland, College Park.
Leinberger, Christopher(2008). The Option Of Urbanism:Investing in a New American Dream. Island Press.
Shahabian,Pooyan; Biazar,Bahare. (2014). Investigating the characteristics and analysis of pedestrian spaces using the walk score method (a case study of Golha neighborhood in Tehran). Master's thesis of Tehran Azad University, Center.
Lamit, Hasanuddin, Shafaghat, Arezoo, & Abd.Majid, Muhdzaini. (2013). Application of the Path Walkability Index (Pawdex) Model. American Scientific Publishers, 3021-3024.
Lerner, Jaime (2014). Urban Acupuncture. Island Press.
Mantri, Anupama. (2008). A GIS Based Approach to Measure Walkability of a Neighborhood. School of Planning University of Cincinnati: A thesis for the degree of Master of Community Planning.
Mckinney, Oana. (2014). An Investigation of Methodologies for Determining Walkability. University of South Florida: thesis.
Moura, Flipe, Cambra, Paulo, & Goncalves, Alexandre (2017). Measuring walkability for distinct pedestrian groups with a aparticipatory assessment method: A case study in Lisbon. Landscape and Urban Planning, 282-296.
Park, Sungjin. (2008). Defining, Measuring, and Evaluating Path Walkability, and Testing Its Impacts on. University of California, Berkeley: A dissertation for the phd degree of City and Regional Planning.
Porta, Sergio, & Renne, John (2005). Linking urban design to sustainability: formal indicators of social urban sustainability field research in Perth,Western Australia. Urban Design International, 51-64.
Speck, Jeff. (2014). Walkable Cities: How Downtown Can Save America, One Step at a Time. North Point Press.
Gehl, Jan. (2013). Cities for People. United Kingdom: Island Press.
References [In Persian]
Abbaszadeh, Shahab & Tamry, Sevda. (2017). Analysis of Factors Affecting the Improvement of Pedestrian Walkway Spatial Quality and Pedestrian-oriented Spaces, in order to Increase the Social Interactions Level of People (The case study: Tarbiat & Valiasr axis, Tabriz metropolitan). Urban Studies, No. 4: 95-104. [In Persian]
Amari, Hassan. (2013). psychology, city and daily life. Tehran: Tisa Publications. [In Persian]
Arendt, Randall. (2007). New Urbanism Charter, translated by: Alireza Danesh and Reza Basiri, Tehran: Process and Urban Planning Publications. [In Persian]
Faizi, Mohammad Javad; Rajabi, Azita & Hosseini, Yasmin. (2017). Recognition of pedestrian movement in the sustainability of dense urban spaces. Urban Management, 10th Volume, No. 30: 179-193. [In Persian]
Gehl, Jan and Svarre, Birgitte. (2014). How to study public life, translated by: Mohammad Saeed Ezadi, Samaneh Mohammadi and Samaneh Khabeiri, Tehran: Center for Studies and Research of Urban Planning and Architecture of Iran. [In Persian]
Gehl, Jan. (2013), Human City, translation: Ali Ghafari and Leila Ghafari, Tehran: Architect Science Institute Publications. [In Persian]
Habibi, Kiyomars; Behzadfar, Mostafa and Jaberi, Irin. (2017). Pedestrian, driver of development in the old urban context. special issue of Manzar of Tehran City Studies and Planning Center, No. 15: 55-61. [In Persian]
Iran Statistics Center. (2015). Population and Housing Census of 2015. Tehran: Iran Statistics Center. [In Persian]
Lotfi, Siddiqe. (2012). Investigation of the role of artificial factors in increasing walking of citizens in the city; Case study: Tehran city", Urban Studies, No. 5: 27-34. [In Persian]
Moeini, Mohammad Mahdi. (2014). Pedestrian Cities. Tehran: Azarakhsh Publications. [In Persian]
Mousavi, Sidi Yaqub. (2016). New Neighborhood, Urban Sociology Model of Neighborhood Development". the special issue of Manzar Tehran Municipality Planning and Studies Center, fourth period, number 18: 67-73. [In Persian]
 Porsartip, Farinaz. (2009). Pedestrian: Strengthening the relationship between man and the urban environment. Urban Studies, No. 31: 29-35. [In Persian]
Pourahmad, Ahmad; Muradpour, Nabi and Hataminejad, Hossein (2017). Investigating the impact of physical dimensions - space to encourage walking in Tehran (Case Study: neighborhood Amirabad and Daneshgah Tehran). Journal of Applied Research in Geographical Sciences; 18 (51):1-22. [In Persian]
Saghafi.A, Arash. (2009). Pedestrianization is a step towards an efficient transport network in a sustainable city. Architecture Thought, No. 22: 15-22. [In Persian]
Shahabian,Pooyan; Lahiji, Romina; Ali Bakshi, Romina and Ali Bakshi, Fatemeh. (2014). Pedestrian Feasibility Assessment in Urban Roads by Combining Three Methods. Seffe, No. 39: 37-52. [In Persian]
Zarif Pour Langroudi, Anahita; Al-Barzi, Fariba and Sohaili, Jamaluddin. (1401). Investigation of urban street facades from the perspective of citizens' perception (case example: 15 Khordad sidewalk, Tehran). Journal of Applied Research in Geographical Sciences, Year 22, Number 66: 325-341. [In Persian]
 
 
استناد به این مقاله: مزرعتی تاج‌آبادی، امید.، شهابیان، پویان.، هنرور، جمال‌الدین. (1402). سنجش تطبیقی پیاده مداری محلی با روش‌های کمّی و اعتبارسنجی نتایج آن‎ها با تحلیل آماری،  فصلنامه برنامه‌ریزی توسعه شهری و منطقه‌ای، 8(27)، 163 -202. DOI: 10.22054/urdp.2023.67860.1439
 Urban and Regional Development Planning  is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License...