Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Department of Urban Planning, Guilan University, Rasht, Iran

2 PhD candidate of Urban planning, Guilan University, Rasht, Iran.

3 Master of Urban Planning, Guilan University, Department of Urban Planning, Rasht, Iran

4 Master of Regional Planning, Guilan University, Rasht, Iran

Abstract

 
Nowadays, a significant aspect of citizens' environmental conduct is intertwined with their connection and emotional bond to the city. This attachment to the urban environment is regarded as a critical element in fostering environmentally conscientious citizens. The present research adopts a descriptive-quantitative approach. A total of 402 questionnaires were completed by residents of Rasht city to collect data, aimed at assessing the influence of city attachment levels and personal characteristics on the manifestation of environmentally supportive behaviors among citizens. The data gathered from the questionnaires were then quantitatively inputted into SPSS software for modeling and analysis, subsequently employing Smart PLS3 software. The research findings, contrary to initial expectations, indicate a lack of significant correlation between indicators such as individual place attachment, city of birth, duration of residence, and educational level, and the environmentally supportive behaviors exhibited by citizens. However, the modeling results reveal that, initially, the environmentally supportive behaviors of citizens are most closely linked to and impacted by their social attachment to the city or place of residence. Subsequently, certain personal characteristics of citizens, including age and marital status, were found to directly influence these environmentally supportive behaviors, indicating a significant relationship between them.
Keywords: Attachment to Place, Pro-environmental Behaviors, Social Attachment to Place, Rasht.
 
 

Introduction

The concept of place attachment, denoting the emotional bond individuals develop with a specific location, encompasses positive emotional sentiments, cognitive thoughts, and behavioral inclinations that evolve over time, reflecting individuals' interactions with their social-physical surroundings, from birth throughout their lives (Bischoff, 2022: 7). Place attachment can manifest across various environmental scales, including the home, neighborhood, urban area, or city (Belanche et al., 2016: 77). While some scholars emphasize place attachment as a significant and influential factor in shaping environmental behaviors, contradictory findings in several studies suggest an uncertain relationship between place attachment and pro-environmental behaviors. It is noted that different dimensions of place attachment may exert varying levels of influence (Junot et al., 2018: 49).
From a scholarly perspective, this research contributes to advancing knowledge in environmental psychology by examining the factors that impact pro-environmental behaviors. In practical terms, the study offers valuable insights for urban and environmental managers and planners concerning the needs, expectations, and behaviors of Rasht citizens regarding various urban and environmental spaces. This information can aid in devising and implementing appropriate programs and policies aimed at preserving and enhancing the urban environment while also enhancing citizens' satisfaction with their preferred locales.

Literature Review

The results of numerous empirical studies consistently indicate the significance of place attachment and community attachment in shaping concerns and pro-environmental behaviors (Buta et al., 2014: 3). For instance, Halpenny (2010) investigated the influence of place attachment on pro-environmental behaviors through structural modeling, affirming the substantial impact of place attachment on intentions for environmental actions.
Ramkissoon and colleagues (2013) argued that place dependence and place identity possess distinct psychological characteristics, leading to differing effects on well-being and overall environmental behaviors, sometimes even contradicting each other. Hence, researchers must consider the multifaceted dimensions of place attachment and their implications for pro-environmental behaviors, as place attachment encompasses social and cultural attachments beyond identity and dependence alone (Junot et al., 2018: 51). In a similar vein, Song and Supramaniam (2019) explored the specific aspects of place attachment that play a more significant role in promoting various pro-environmental behaviors. Their findings highlighted the greater influence of social attachment over individual attachment on pro-environmental behaviors.
In another study, Soleimani and colleagues (2020) investigated the impact of different components of place attachment on social participation in environmental conservation in Tehran. Their research revealed that 36 percent of the positive changes in citizens' environmental engagement could be attributed to components related to identity and dependence in place attachment, with the identity component exerting a more substantial influence than the dependence component.

Methodology

The current study adopts a descriptive-quantitative approach to address research issues, with an applied objective. Data collection involved surveys and document analysis. The questionnaire comprised four sections: personal characteristics, individual place attachment, social place attachment, and pro-environmental behaviors of citizens, each containing relevant indicators. A total of 402 online questionnaires were distributed to citizens and residents of Rasht. The data from these surveys were quantitatively inputted into SPSS software. Initial validation of the questionnaire was conducted through examination of the Cronbach's alpha coefficient, indicating strong internal reliability and trustworthiness with a value of 0.92. Subsequent modeling and analysis of the findings were performed using Smart PLS3 software. Reliability methods (including composite reliability, Cronbach's alpha, and average variance extracted) and validity methods (such as confirmatory factor analysis, and convergent and discriminant validity) were employed to assess the collected data.

Results

Based on the results gleaned from the questionnaires, the "individual place attachment" index exhibited the highest average score of 4.01, ranking first. It was followed by the indices of "citizens' pro-environmental behaviors" and "social place attachment" with averages of 3.48 and 3.25, respectively. Notably, the statement "I often participate in local projects and activities" received the lowest average score of 2.23, while "interest in the traditional native culture of this city" received the highest average score of 4.17 among the statements.
Furthermore, examining the factors of individual place attachment revealed that the factor "I consider Rasht a part of my being" had the highest coefficient of overlap at 0.912, indicating strong attachment. Conversely, "living in Rasht defines various aspects of my personality and identity" showed the least overlap with a coefficient of 0.764. Regarding social place attachment, the factor "I love the native culture and tradition of this city" exhibited the highest overlap coefficient at 0.817, highlighting the significant role of culture in fostering attachment. Conversely, "I participate in the city's social programs" had the least overlap with a coefficient of 0.644. Among citizens' pro-environmental behaviors, "I often talk about environmental issues with my friends" showed the highest overlap with a coefficient of 0.798, while "attention to vehicle pollution standards and fuel consumption when buying" had the least overlap at 0.676.
Moreover, analyzing individual characteristics indicated that age had the highest coefficient of overlap at 0.949, followed by marital status at 0.830.
In terms of the structural equation model employed in the research, the independent indices were able to predict 36.8 percent of the variance changes in the dependent index. Notably, the index of social place attachment exhibited the most significant impact on the dependent index with a coefficient of 0.575, followed by the index of personal characteristics with a coefficient of 0.193. Conversely, the index of individual place attachment, despite its inverse relationship, had an insignificant and negligible impact on citizens' pro-environmental behaviors, indicated by a coefficient of -0.013.

Conclusion

The findings of this study underscore the influence of various individual characteristics, such as age and marital status, on citizens' pro-environmental behaviors, indicating a direct correlation between these factors. Notably, married individuals demonstrate a greater concern for the environment compared to their single counterparts. Similarly, the research reveals that as individuals age, they tend to exhibit more environmentally supportive behaviors, underscoring heightened environmental awareness and action among middle-aged and older demographics compared to younger age groups.
Furthermore, the research highlights a noticeable lack of social interactions among citizens, particularly a deficiency in civic participation within the city. This lack of social engagement stands as a primary impediment to fostering stronger social attachments among citizens. Addressing this challenge necessitates a focused approach aimed at enhancing citizens' social attachment to their environment. This can be achieved by creating conducive urban spaces designed to facilitate greater interpersonal interaction. Additionally, leveraging citizen input and perspectives to bolster their involvement and collaboration with urban management can significantly contribute to shifting attitudes and fostering a heightened sense of responsibility toward the urban and surrounding environment.
Moreover, providing financial support and resources to non-governmental organizations operating in the environmental sector can serve as a pivotal and impactful measure in driving positive changes in citizens' attitudes and behaviors, ultimately leading to a more environmentally conscious and engaged populace.
 
 
 
 

Keywords

Main Subjects

 
Belanche, D., Casaló, L. V., & Orús, C. (2016). City attachment and use of urban services: Benefits for smart cities. Cities, 50, 75-81.
Bischoff, L. P. (2022). Predicting Neighborhood Attachment in Germany.
Brown, R. (2000). Social identity theory: Past achievements, current problems and future challenges. European journal of social psychology, 30(6), 745-778.‏
Buta, N., Holland, S. M., & Kaplanidou, K. (2014). Local communities and protected areas: The mediating role of place attachment for pro-environmental civic engagement. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 5, 1-10.
Casaló, L. V., & Escario, J. J. (2018). Heterogeneity in the association between environmental attitudes and pro-environmental behavior: A multilevel regression approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 175, 155-163.
Chao, S. H., Jiang, J. Z., Wei, K. C., Ng, E., Hsu, C. H., Chiang, Y. T., & Fang, W. T. (2021). Understanding pro-environmental behavior of citizen science: An exploratory study of the bird survey in Taoyuan’s farm ponds project. Sustainability, 13(9), 5126.
Cheng, T. E., Wang, J., Cao, M. M., Zhang, D. J., & Bai, H. X. (2018). The relationships among interpretive service quality, satisfaction, place attachment and environmentally responsible behavior at the cultural heritage sites in Xi’an, China. Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res, 16, 6317-6339.‏
Chiu, Y. T. H., Lee, W. I., & Chen, T. H. (2014). Environmentally responsible behavior in ecotourism: Antecedents and implications. Tourism management, 40, 321-329.‏
Coertjens, L., Boeve-de Pauw, J., De Maeyer, S., & Van Petegem, P. (2010). Do Schools Make a Difference in Their Students’environmental Attitudes and Awareness? Evidence From Pisa 2006. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(3), 497-522.
Costa, R., Wang, C., & Baker, J. W. (2022). Integrating Place Attachment into Housing Recovery Simulations to Estimate Population Losses. Natural Hazards Review, 23(4), 1-13.
Daryanto, A., & Song, Z. (2021). A meta-analysis of the relationship between place attachment and pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Business Research, 123, 208-219.‏
Dono, J., Webb, J., & Richardson, B. (2010). The relationship between environmental activism, pro-environmental behaviour and social identity. Journal of environmental psychology, 30(2), 178-186.‏
Halpenny, E. A. (2010). Pro-environmental behaviours and park visitors: The effect of place attachment. Journal of environmental psychology, 30(4), 409-421.‏
Hipp, J. R., & Perrin, A. (2006). Nested loyalties: Local networks' effects on neighbourhood and community cohesion. Urban Studies, 43(13), 2503-2523.
Jalu, M. T., Ahmed, A., Hashi, A., & Tekilu, A. (2019). Exploring barriers to reproductive, maternal, child and neonatal (RMNCH) health-seeking behaviors in Somali region, Ethiopia. PLoS one, 14(3), e0212227.
Juárez-Nájera, M., Rivera-Martínez, J. G., & Hafkamp, W. A. (2010). An explorative socio-psychological model for determining sustainable behavior: Pilot study in German and Mexican Universities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(7), 686-694.
Junot, A., Paquet, Y., & Fenouillet, F. (2018). Place attachment influence on human well-being and general pro-environmental behaviors. Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology, 2, 49–57.
Kamalipour, H., Yeganeh, A. J., & Alalhesabi, M. (2012).Predictors of Place Attachment in Urban Residential Environments: A Residential Complex Case Study. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 35, 475-469. [In Persian]
Larson, L. R., Stedman, R. C., Cooper, C. B., & Decker, D. J. (2015). Understanding the multi-dimensional structure of pro-environmental behavior. Journal of environmental psychology, 43, 112-124.
Lee, T. H. (2011). How recreation involvement, place attachment and conservation commitment affect environmentally responsible behavior. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 19(7), 895-915.‏
Lee, Y. K., Pei, F., Ryu, K. S., & Choi, S. (2019). Why the tripartite relationship of place attachment, loyalty, and pro-environmental behaviour matter?. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 24(3), 250-267.‏
Lewicka, M. (2011), Place attachment: How far have we come in the last 40 years? Environmental Psychology, 31, 207–230.
Liao, Y., & Yang, W. (2022). The determinants of different types of private-sphere pro-environmental behaviour: an integrating framework. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24(6), 8566-8592.
Livingston,M., Bailey, N., & Kearns, A. (2008). People’s attachment to place: the influnece of neighborhood deprivation. Project Report. Charted institute of Housing/Joseph Rowntree Foundation, coventry, Glasgow.
Lo, A. Y., & Jim, C. Y. (2010). Differential community effects on perception and use of urban greenspaces. Cities, 27(6), 430-442.
Marcus, C. C. (1992), Environmental memories. In Low, S. M.and Altman, I. (Eds.) Place Attachment, New York, Plenum Press
Mishra, S.; Mazumdar, S. & Suar, D. 2010. Place attachment and flood preparedness. Journal of Environmental psychology, 30: 187-197..
Perkins, D. D., & Long, D. A. (2002). Neighborhood sense of community and social capital. In Psychological sense of community (pp. 291-318). Springer, Boston, MA.‏.
Ramkissoon, H., & Mavondo, F. (2014). Proenvironmental behavior: The link between place attachment and place satisfaction. Tourism Analysis, 19(6), 673-688.‏
Ramkissoon, H., Smith, L. D. G., & Weiler, B. (2013a). Relationships between place attachment, place satisfaction and pro-environmental behaviour in an Australian national park. Journal of Sustainable tourism, 21(3), 434-457.‏
Ramkissoon, H., Smith, L. D. G., & Weiler, B. (2013b). Testing the dimensionality of place attachment and its relationships with place satisfaction and pro-environmental behaviours: A structural equation modelling approach. Tourism management, 36, 552-566.‏
Ramkissoon, H., Weiler, B., & Smith, L. D. G. (2012). Place attachment and pro-environmental behaviour in national parks: The development of a conceptual framework. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 20(2), 257-276.‏
Raymond, C. M., Brown, G., & Weber, D. (2010). The measurement of place attachment: Personal, community, and environmental connections. Journal of environmental psychology, 30(4), 422-434.‏
Rivlin, L. (1987), The neighborhood, personal identity and group affiliation, I. Altman and A.Wandersman (Eds.), Neighborhood and Community Environments, New York, Plenum Press.
Rollero, C., & De Piccoli, N. (2010). Does place attachment affect social well-being?. European Review of Applied Psychology, 60(4), 233-238.
Scannell, L., & Gifford, R. (2010). The relations between natural and civic place attachment and pro-environmental behavior. Journal of environmental psychology, 30(3), 289-297.
Song, Z., & Soopramanien, D. (2019). Types of place attachment and pro-environmental behaviors of urban residents in Beijing. Cities, 84, 112-120.‏
Tonge, J., Ryan, M. M., Moore, S. A., & Beckley, L. E. (2015). The effect of place attachment on pro-environment behavioral intentions of visitors to coastal natural area tourist destinations. Journal of Travel Research, 54(6), 730–743.
Trentelman, C. K. (2009) “Place Attachment and Community Attachment: A Primer Ground ed in the Lived Experience of a Community Sociologist,” Society and Natural Resources: An International Journal, 22(3), 191-210.
Tsai, C. C., Li, X., & Wu, W. N. (2021). Explaining citizens’ pro‐environmental behaviours in public and private spheres: The mediating role of willingness to sacrifice for the environment. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 80(3), 510-538.
Ujang, N. (2012). Place attachment and continuity of urban place identity. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 49, 156-167.
Uzzell, D., Pol, E., & Badenas, D. (2002). Place identification, social cohesion, and enviornmental sustainability. Environment and behavior, 34(1), 26-53.‏
Walker, I., Leviston, Z., Price, J., & Devine-Wright, P. (2015). Responses to a worsening environment: Relative deprivation mediates between place attachments and behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45(7), 833–846.
Westin, K. (2016). Place attachment and mobility in city regions. Population, Space and Place, 22(8), 722-735.
Williams, D., Stewart, W.; Kruger, L. (2013), Place-based conservation: advancing social theory and practice. In Place-based conservation: Perspectives from the social sciences, New York: Springer.
Xu, J., & Han, R. (2019). The influence of place attachment on pro-environmental behaviors: The moderating effect of social media. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(24), 5100.‏
Yang, L., Fang, X., & Zhu, J. (2022). Citizen environmental behavior from the perspective of psychological distance based on a visual analysis of bibliometrics and scientific knowledge mapping. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 6716.
Yoon, A., Jeong, D., & Chon, J. (2021). The impact of the risk perception of ocean microplastics on tourists' pro-environmental behavior intention. Science of the Total Environment, 774, 144782.
Yuan, Q., Song, H., Chen, N., & Shang, W. (2019). Roles of tourism involvement and place attachment in determining residents’ attitudes toward industrial heritage tourism in a resource-exhausted city in China. Sustainability, 11(19), 5151.
Zsóka, Á., Szerényi, Z. M., Széchy, A., & Kocsis, T. (2013). Greening due to environmental education? Environmental knowledge, attitudes, consumer behavior and everyday pro-environmental activities of Hungarian high school and university students. Journal of cleaner production, 48, 126-138.

 

 
 
 
 
استناد به این مقاله:  سالاری پور، علی‌اکبر.، حمیدی، آرمان.، فریدی فشتمی، عالیه.، نوربخش، امیرحسین. (1403). بررسی تأثیر دلبستگی به مکان بر رفتارهای حامی محیط زیستی شهروندان (مطالعه موردی: شهر رشت)،  فصلنامه برنامه‌ریزی توسعه شهری و منطقه‌ای، 9(29)، 1 -38. DOI: 10.22054/urdp.2024.76342.1597
 Urban and Regional Development Planning  is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License...