Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 PhD Student, Department of Urban Planning, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran.

2 Professor, Department of Urban planning, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Iran University of Science & Technology, Tehran,Iran

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Urban planning, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Iran University of Science & Technology, Tehran,Iran

Abstract

Given the vital role of socio-cultural and psychological components in shaping sustainable neighborhoods, these dimensions have rarely been studied in a comprehensive and systematic manner. With the growing importance of improving the quality of life for children as the future generation, designing sustainable neighborhoods with a child-friendly approach has gained increasing attention. This study aims to identify and prioritize the socio-cultural and psychological components of sustainable child-friendly neighborhoods and to propose a practical framework in this field. Conducted using a qualitative, descriptive method and logical reasoning, the research first employed a systematic review of scientific literature and credible national and international sources to extract relevant components. These components were then prioritized using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) based on expert input from 20 specialists. Finally, through a comparative analysis, key components were identified at three scales: metropolitan, intermediate, and small cities. The findings indicate that the socio-cultural components include education, justice, interaction and participation, accessibility, well-being and quality of life, cohesion, identity and sense of belonging, responsibility, event-based activities, diversity, and safety and security. The psychological components include spatial and environmental perception, emotional and mental well-being, psycho-social interactions, psychological and social support, psychological resilience, cognitive stimulation and creative learning, sense of belonging and meaning, and personal and character development. These components contribute to enhancing children’s quality of life and support the development of safe environments for their growth. The proposed model serves as a strategic tool for policymakers, planners, and urban designers to integrate children's needs into sustainable development processes.

Keywords

Main Subjects

  • Adewumi, A. S., Onyango, V., Moyo, D., & Dawodu, A. (2023). Conceptualising the characteristics of the indicators of a neighbourhood sustainability assessment framework in a developing country context. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 102(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107197
  • Chan, L., Erling, E., Mizunoya, S., & Zaw, H. (2016). A city fit for children: Mapping and analysis of child friendly cities initiatives. The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Centre for Rights and Justice Occasional Paper Series, 35, 1-60. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2882991
  • Corsi, M. (2002). The child-friendly cities initiative in Italy. Environment & Urbanization, 14(2), 140-169. https://doi.org/10.1177/095624780201400214
  • Dessouky, N., Wheeler, S., & Salama, A. M. (2023). Including local actors' perspective in neighborhood sustainability assessment: Evidence from Dubai's sustainable city. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, Ahead of Print, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1108/SASBE-03-2023-0052
  • Elkhouli, A. (2022). Child friendly city as a participatory approach to enhance sustainable development: Case of Mingdong Community, Ningbo. Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2-12. https://doi.org/1088/1755-1315/1113/1/012023
  • Garcia, D. A., Noelke, C., & McArdle, N. (2020). The geography of child opportunity: Why neighborhoods matter for equity. First findings from the Child Opportunity Index 2.0. Diversity Data Kids. Retrieved from diversitydatakids.org/research-library/coi-30-technical-documentation .
  • Kohon, J. (2018). Social inclusion in the sustainable neighborhood? Idealism of urban social sustainability theory complicated by realities of community planning practice. City, Culture and Society, 15, 14–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccs.2018.08.005
  • Krishnamurthy, S. (2019). Reclaiming spaces: Child inclusive urban design. Cities & Health, 3(1-2), 86-98. https://doi.org/10.1080/23748834.2019.1586327
  • Lueder, R. (2007). Designing cities and neighborhoods for children. In Ergonomics for Children 823–860. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203609163.secg
  • Manouchehri, B., Burns, E. A., Rudner, J., & Davoudi, S. (2021). Creating a child-friendly neighborhood: Iranian school children talk about desirable and undesirable elements in their neighborhoods. Journal of Children, Youth and Environments, 31(3). https://journals.uc.edu/index.php/cye/article/view/4710
  • Mohammed, Z., & Alrobaee, T. R. (2024). Measuring and analyzing the indicators of sustainable urban housing for achieving a sustainable housing environment: Al-Hindiya neighbourhood in the Najaf city as a case study. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 19(5), 1735-1746. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.190511
  • Martin, K. E., & Wood, L. J. (2013). ‘We live here too’: What makes a child-friendly neighbourhood? In A. C. Michalos (Ed.), Wellbeing. Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118539415.wbwell061
  • Mirani, A. (2023). Evaluation of neighbourhood sustainability assessment tools for practicing on an existing neighbourhood in Great Paris. In Proceedings of the 2023 Building Simulation Conference. https://doi.org/10.26868/25222708.2023.1572
  • Mohammed Ali, N. K., &Abbas Ahmed, Z. (2021). Planning sustainable environmental neighborhoods is a step towards the direction of sustainable cities. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 754(1), 012033. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/754/1/012033
  • Pulgar Rubilar, P., Jordán Vidal, M. M., Blanco Fernández, D., Osorio Ramirez, M., Perillán Torres, L., Lizana Vial, M., Lobos Calquin, D., Pardo Fabregat, F., & Navarro Pedreño, J. (2023). Neighbourhood sustainability assessment tools for sustainable cities and communities, a literature review—New trends for new requirements. Buildings, 13(11), 2782. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13112782
  • Tayefi Nasrabadi, M., Higueras Garcia, E., & Pourzakarya, M. (2021). Let children plan neighborhoods for a sustainable future: A sustainable child-friendly city. Local Environment: The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability, 26(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2021.1884668
  • Woolcock, G., & Steele, W. (2008). Child-friendly community indicators: A literature review. Prepared by the Urban Research Program for the NSW Commission for Children & Young People. https://catalogue.nla.gov.au/catalog/4928330
  • wright et al, Wright, H., Hargrave, J., Williams, S., & zu Dohna, F. (2017). Cities Alive: Designing for Urban Childhoods. Arup. https://www.arup.com/insights/cities-alive-designing-for-urban-childhoods
  • Zerlina, D., & Sulaiman, C. C. (2020). Towards the innovative planning for child-friendly neighbourhood in Jakarta. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 592(1), 012023. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/592/1/012023
  • Zhou, M., Fang, H., & Mu, H. (2019). Is the city friendly to children? — Construction of urban child friendly degree evaluation system and application based on M city. In Proceedings of the 2019 5th International Conference on Social Science and Higher Education (ICSSHE 2019) (pp. 564–568). https://doi.org/10.2991/icsshe-19.2019.162