نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری رشته شهرسازی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران.

2 دانشیار گروه شهرسازی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران.

چکیده

در بسیاری از سکونتگاه‌های غیررسمی، کیفیت فضاهای شهری به دلیل فقدان برنامه‌ریزی و توجه به نیازهای ساکنان، به شدت پایین است. این موضوع، چالش‌های متعددی را در زمینه‌های مختلف از جمله سلامت، امنیت، اقتصاد و محیط‌زیست به وجود می‌آورد. مکان‌سازی به‌عنوان رویکردی نوین در طراحی و مدیریت فضاهای شهری، می‌تواند به ارتقای کیفیت زندگی در سکونتگاه‌های غیررسمی کمک کند. این تحقیق با رویکرد تفسیری و روش کیفی از نوع مطالعه موردی، به‌صورت تحلیلی - توصیفی صورت‌گرفته است. جامعه آماری شامل متخصصان دانشگاهی و سرپرستان دفاتر تسهیلگری و مدیران شهری بود که به‌صورت هدفمند از نوع گلوله‌برفی انتخاب شدند. ابتدا از روش فراترکیب برای شناسایی مؤلفه‌های مکان‌سازی استفاده شد و سپس چالش‌ها از طریق مشاهده و مصاحبه‌های عمیق و نیمه‌ساختاریافته با متخصصان بررسی شدند. تحلیل داده‌ها با استفاده از نرم‌افزار MAXQDA و کدگذاری بر اساس ابعاد مدیریتی، اجتماعی، اقتصادی و کالبدی انجام شد. نتایج نشان داد که مکان‌سازی فرایندی زمان‌بر و مشارکتی است که نیازمند هماهنگی بین ذی‌نفعان، زیرساخت‌های مناسب و درک مزایای مکان‌سازی به سبب جدید بودن موضوع، توسط مقامات و جامعه محلی است. همچنین تأمین منابع مالی و اعتمادسازی از چالش‌های اصلی این فرایند محسوب می‌شوند. یافته‌های این تحقیق می‌تواند به‌عنوان سند راهنما برای مدیران و دفاتر تسهیلگری جهت ارتقای کیفیت فضاهای شهری در سکونتگاه‌های غیررسمی مورداستفاده قرار گیرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Identifying Components and Challenges of Placemaking for Urban Space Development in Informal Settlements: (A Case Study of Golshan Park, Khaksefid Neighborhood, Tehran)

نویسندگان [English]

  • ّFaezeh Mohammadi sheshkal 1
  • Mohammad shaikhi 2

1 PhD Candidate, Department of Urban Planning, Allameh Tabatab'i University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Associate Professor, Department of Urban Planning, Allameh Tabatab'i University, Tehran, Iran.

چکیده [English]

In many informal settlements, the quality of urban spaces is severely compromised by a lack of planning and attention to the needs of residents. This has led to numerous challenges across various domains, including health, safety, economy, and the environment. Placemaking, as a novel approach to urban space design and management, offers a promising avenue for enhancing the quality of life in informal settlements.This research adopted an interpretive and qualitative approach, employing a case study design and a descriptive-analytical method. The study population consisted of academic experts, community facilitators, and urban managers, who were purposively selected using a snowball sampling technique. Initially, a meta-synthesis method was used to identify the components of placemaking. Subsequently, challenges were explored through observations and in-depth semi-structured interviews with experts. Data analysis was conducted using MAXQDA software, with coding based on managerial, social, economic, and physical dimensions.The findings revealed that placemaking is a time-consuming and participatory process that requires coordination among stakeholders, adequate infrastructure, and a comprehensive understanding of the benefits of placemaking, given its novelty among both officials and the local community. Additionally, securing financial resources and building trust emerged as significant challenges. The insights from this research can serve as a guiding document for managers and community facilitators in their efforts to improve the quality of urban spaces in informal settlements.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Placemaking
  • Urban space
  • Informal settlement
  • Khaksefid neighborhood
  • Abd El Gawad, N. S., Al-Hagla, K. S., & Nassar, D. M. (2019). Place making as an approach to revitalize neglected urban open spaces (NUOS): A case study on Rod El Farag Flyover in Shoubra, Cairo. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 58 (3), 967-976.
  • Alzahrani, A., Borsi, K., & Jarman, D. (2017). Place-making and its implications for social value: A comparison study of two urban squares in London. Urban Regeneration and Sustainability, 12 (4), 752-762.

   https://doi.org/10.2495/URS170641

  • Atkins, S., Lewin, S., Smith, H., Engel, M., Fretheim, A., & Volmink, J. (2008). Conducting a meta-ethnography of qualitative literature: Lessons learnt. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8 (1), 21.

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-21

  • Bonakdar, Ahmad., Gharai, Fariba. (2011). Paradigm Shifts in Urban Design Principles: From Physical, Social, and Perceptual Components to the Place-Making Approach. Nameh-ye Memari va Shahrsazi, 3(6). [In Persian]
  • Council, M. P. (2008). A guide to neighborhood placemaking in Chicago. Project for Public Spaces Inc, Metropolitan Planning Council.
  • Davis, M. (2006). Planet of slums. London: Verso.
  • De Brito, M., Richards, G. (2017). Events and placemaking. International Journal of Event and Festival Management, 8 (1), 8-23.
  • Ebrahimipour, Bahare., Ostadi, Maryam. (2021). Explanation of the Conceptual-Analytical Framework of Place-Making with Emphasis on the Connection of Places in the Old and Middle Context of Mashhad City. Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development, 14(37), 133-149. [In Persian]
  • Franck, K., & Stevens, Q. (2006). Loose space: Possibility and diversity in urban life. Routledge.
  • Gol Faramarzi, Afshin., Hataminejad, Hossein., Sarvar, Rahim. (2016). The Role of People in Empowering and Improving Informal Settlements (Case Study: Golestan City, Meymantabad Neighborhood on the Shadchai Riverbank). Third International Conference on Modern Research in Management, Economics, and Humanities. [In Persian]
  • Golkar, Kurosh. (2003). From Birth to Maturity of Urban Design. Soffeh Scientific-Research Journal, 36(13). [In Persian]
  • Irandoost, Kiyoomars., Azami, Mohammad., Tavalaee, Roholla. (2014). Indicators for Defining and Determining Informal Settlements in Iran. Urban and Regional Studies and Research, 6(21), 43-60. [In Persian]
  • Ismail, N. A., Aceska, A., & Adu-Ampong, E. A. (2023). “We closed down Mpape on the Judgement Day”: Resistance and place-making in urban informal settlements in Abuja, Nigeria. Urban Forum, 34 (1), 1-17.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s12132-023-09483-1

  • Kamalipour, H. (2020). Improvising places: The fluidity of space in informal settlements. Sustainability, 12. 2293, (6). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062293
  • Kamalipour, H. (2023). Shaping public space in informal settlements: A case study. Sustainability, 15. 3781, (4).
  • Krause, Renate. (2014). Placemaking in the RhineMain Regionalpark. Masters program in European Spatial Planning and Regional Development Department of Spatial Planning.
  • Lombard, M. (2014). Constructing ordinary places: Place-making in urban informal settlements in Mexico. Progress in Planning, 94, 1–53.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2013.05.003

  • Ludvigsen, M. S., Hall, E. O., Meyer, G., Fegran, L., Aagaard, H., & Uhrenfeldt, L. (2016). Using Sandelowski and Barroso's meta-synthesis method in advancing qualitative evidence. Qualitative Health Research, 26. 329-320, (3). https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315569733
  • Mahmoudi, Mehdi. (2011). Assessing the Quality of the Urban Environment in District 4 of Tehran Municipality (A Comparative Study of Narmak and Khak-e Sefid Neighborhoods). Master’s Thesis in Geography and Urban Planning. [In Persian]
  • Mahvari, Parissa., Ghalehnoee, Mahmoud., Mokhtarzadeh, Safoora. (2020). Assessing the Quality of Urban Space Based on Place-Making Criteria with Emphasis on Accessibility Quality; Case Study: Atiq Square, Isfahan. Urban Studies Quarterly, 9(35), 47-60. [In Persian]
  • Mehanna, W., & Mehanna, W. (2023). Place-making as an approach to develop informal housing area's urban spaces. ACE: Arquitectura, Ciudad y Entorno.
  • Mukhija, V. (2001). Upgrading housing settlements in developing countries: The impact of existing physical conditions. Cities, 18 (4), 213-222. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-2751(01)00013-8
  • Mwamba, J. S. (2020). Analysing the sustainability challenges of informal urban settlements: The case of Chibolya in Lusaka, Zambia. Journal of Sustainable Development, 13. 55, (6).
  • Pazhoutan, Elahe. (2017). Women’s Knowledge and Action in Place-Making: A Review of Two Experiences. Haft Shahr Journal of Urbanism and Architecture, (61). [In Persian]
  • Pardaraz Consulting Engineers. (2008). Urban Landscape Plan for West Khak-e Sefid. Tehran Municipality Renovation Organization. [In Persian]
  • Pouyan, Saleh; Tavakolan, Ali; Kargar, Bahman. (2022). Evaluating the Effectiveness of Sustainable Urban Regeneration Programs on Improving the Quality of Life of Residents in Informal Settlements (Case Study: Rasht City). Human Settlements Planning Studies, 17(2), 377-390. [In Persian]
  • Project for Public Spaces. (2012). Placemaking and the future of cities.
  • Project for Public Spaces. (2018). Placemaking–what if we built our cities around places?
  • Shwartz-Ziv, T., & Strier, R. (2022). Place-making: Toward a place-aware community practice agenda. The British Journal of Social Work, 52. 61-78, (1). https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcab186
  • Singh, H. (2024). Visual impressions and interventions in non-place spaces within Maqboolpura: A case study of an informal settlement in Amritsar. ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, 5. 1153-1135, (1).

https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i1.2024.998

  • Suhartini, N., & Jones, P. (2023). Informality and responding to the challenges of informal settlements. In Beyond the informal: Understanding self-organized kampungs in Indonesia (pp. 17-36). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78971-9_2
  • UN-HABITAT. (2006). The state of the world’s cities report 2006/2007: The millennium development goals and urban sustainability. Nairobi: United Nations Human Settlements Programme.
  • UN-Habitat. (2008). The State of the World’s Cities Report 2008/2009: Harmonious cities. Nairobi: United Nations Human Settlements Programme.
  • UN-HABITAT. (2008). State of the world’s cities 2010/2011: Bridging the urban divide. London: Earthscan Publications Ltd.

https://doi.org/10.4324/9781849774864

  • UN-HABITAT. (2016). Sustainable urban development and Agenda 2030: UN-HABITAT’s programme framework. Participatory Slum Upgrading Programme transforming the lives of one billion slum dwellers. Nairobi. https://www.mypsup.org/library_files/downloads/SDGs%20and%20PSUP.pdf
  • UN-HABITAT. (d.). The Participatory Slum Upgrading Programme (PSUP). Retrieved from https://unhabitat.org/programme/the-participatory-slum-upgrading-programme-psup
  • Wyckoff, M. A. (2014). Definition of placemaking: four different types. Planning & Zoning News, 32. 1, (3).