نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری، گروه شهرسازی، واحد کرمان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، کرمان، ایران

2 استادیار گروه شهرسازی، واحد کرمان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، کرمان، ایران

3 استادیار گروه مهندسی عمران، واحد گرگان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، گرگان، ایران

چکیده

در دهه‌های اخیر، استقرار و استفاده از دوچرخه در بسیاری از شهرهای جهان رواج داشته ولی بااین‌وجود استفاده از آن در شهرهای ایران محدود می‌باشد. هدف از پژوهش؛ بررسی میزان مقبولیت عمومی استفاده از دوچرخه در شهر کوچک آق‌قلا می‌باشد. رویکرد پژوهش، کمّی توأم با منطق استدلال قیاسی و ماهیت آن پیمایشی است. به‌منظور جمع‌آوری داده‌ها از یک پرسشنامه محقق ساخته و حجم نمونه 400 نفری استفاده گردیده که در تدوین آن از دو مدل «یوتات» و نظریه «رفتار برنامه‌ریزی‌شده» استفاده‌شده است. براین‌اساس، یافته‌های پژوهش نشانگر مقبولیت اندک و نکات ضعف محسوسی در شهر آق‌قلا در ابعاد اجتماعی استفاده از دوچرخه و عدم‌تأیید معناداری ضرایب همبستگی متغیرهایی همانند «نگرش»، «هنجارهای تأکیدی» و حتی «سودمندی درک شده» با متغیر رفتار هست. در این زمینه، عدم باور به دوچرخه به‌عنوان یک وسیله سفر مشاهده می‌شود و نگرش ورزش به دوچرخه بیشتر نمایان می‌باشد. نتایج آزمون رگرسیون خطی چندگانه پژوهش نیز نشانگر معناداری کل مدل و وجود رابطه مابین متغیرهای اجتماعی- روان‌شناختی پژوهش و نیز معناداری سه متغیر اثرگذار «آگاهی» (292/0+)، «هنجارهای توصیفی» (243/0+) و «تأثیرپذیری فردی» (312/0-) و ضریب تعیین تعدیل‌شده دارای مقدار 23% از تغییرات تبدیل‌پذیری در متغیر وابسته است. در پایان، نیز یافته‌های آماری پژوهش بازخوانی و تفسیر گردیده‌اند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Analyzing Public Acceptance Levels of Bicycle Usage in Aq Qala City: A Behavioral Study

نویسندگان [English]

  • Roghayeh Bakhshandeh 1
  • Korosh Afzali 2
  • Mohamadhadi Almasi 3

1 PhD Candidate, Department of Urban Planning, Kerman Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kerman, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Urban Planning, Kerman Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kerman, Iran

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Gorgan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Gorgan, Iran

چکیده [English]

 
In recent decades, the popularity of establishing and utilizing bicycles has spread across numerous cities worldwide, yet its adoption remains limited in Iranian urban centers. The aim of this study is to investigate the public acceptability of bicycle usage in the small town of Aq Qala. The research adopts a quantitative approach combined with deductive reasoning and employs a survey methodology. Data collection utilized a researcher-developed questionnaire, targeting a sample size of 400 individuals. The findings reveal a low level of public acceptance towards bicycle usage, highlighting significant deficiencies in the social dimensions of bicycle utilization within Aq Qala. Moreover, the study observes a lack of significant correlation coefficients among variables such as "attitudes," "Injunctive norms," and even "perceived usefulness" with behavioral variables. This context suggests a prevalent disbelief in bicycles as a viable mode of transportation, with a stronger inclination towards associating bicycles with recreational activities. Additionally, results from the multiple linear regression test underscore the significance of the overall model, highlighting a relationship among socio-psychological variables within the research framework. Notably, the three influencing variables identified are awareness (+0.292), descriptive norms (+0.243), and individual affectivity (-0.312), contributing to a 23% change in the transformability of the dependent variable, as indicated by the adjusted coefficient of determination. Conclusively, the study's statistical findings have been meticulously reviewed and interpreted, shedding light on the complex dynamics surrounding public acceptability of bicycle usage in Aq Qala.
Keywords: Bicycle, Public Acceptance, Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) Model, Theory of Planned Behavior, Aq Qala.
 
 

Introduction

Transportation has emerged as a fundamental and pivotal component in the structure and governance of contemporary cities, with its significance transcending mere population size. The design and interplay of transportation components within a city carry profound implications for urban sustainability. Among sustainable and physically based transportation modes, the bicycle stands out as a vehicle mobility option. However, empirical research indicates that its impact extends beyond infrastructural aspects like dedicated cycling lanes and routes; cultural, social, and behavioral dimensions also play pivotal roles.
The primary focus of this research is to delve into the behavioral dimensions of bicycle usage within the framework of a comprehensive index of public acceptability. This index serves as a measurement tool to gauge the level of public acceptance and identify the influential variables affecting bicycle usage as a mode of travel.
The research questions guiding this investigation are as follows:

How can we develop a composite and responsive model for bicycle usage, utilizing existing models for measuring public acceptability?
What is the level and scale of public acceptability regarding bicycle usage in the small town of Aq Qala, assessed through social-behavioral analysis indicators?
Literature Review

Compared to motorized transportation modes, bicycles possess a higher relative advantage across various urban mobility indicators, including speed, agility, flexibility, and the public health benefits they confer upon cities. This recognition has led to the development of a range of new supporting theories within this scientific domain. These theories, from "new urbanism" to "15-minute cities," underscore the significance and integral role of bicycles within the urban transportation system.

Methodology

The methodology employed in this research adopts a quantitative approach coupled with the logic of deductive reasoning, rooted in survey research. Data collection utilized a researcher-developed questionnaire comprising a set of main variables along with auxiliary variables, totaling sixteen variables and 89 items. A sample size of 400 individuals was selected using a simple random sampling method. The study utilized a hybrid model derived from two well-known and widely used models: the "UTAUT" model and the "Theory of Planned Behavior." This hybrid model served as the framework for measuring the public acceptability index. The approach to measuring public acceptability in this research entails a sociological perspective, observing the potential practical utilization of bicycles in the city of Aq Qala as a case study.

Results

According to fundamental transportation variables and statistical data, it is observed that 50% of the population of Aq Qala owns a car, with 86% having access to one. In contrast, the ownership rate of bicycles stands at 35%, with a corresponding access rate of 53%. Regarding practical cycling behavior, the average cycling behavior among residents of Aq Qala city is estimated at 2.45 out of 5 points on the Likert scale, with 70% of the city's populace abstaining from using bicycles for travel. The inferential findings of this research unveil low acceptability and notable deficiencies in the social dimensions of bicycle usage within Aq Qala city. Moreover, there is a lack of significant confirmation regarding correlation coefficients among variables such as "attitude," "emphasized norms," and even "perceived usefulness" with the behavior variable. This context underscores a prevalent skepticism towards bicycles as a viable mode of travel, while a more pronounced inclination towards associating bicycles with sporting activities is observed. Further analysis through the multiple linear regression test reveals the overall significance of the model, establishing a relationship among socio-psychological variables within the research framework. Specifically, the three influencing variables "awareness" (+0.292), "descriptive norms" (+0.243), and "individual susceptibility" (-0.312) are found to be significant, contributing to a 23% change in the transformability of the dependent variable as indicated by the adjusted coefficient of determination.

Discussion

Generally, there has been limited research concerning bicycle usage in small cities, with the majority of studies predominantly centered on large cities. Consequently, directing attention towards small cities enables enhanced comparability of findings within this specific context.

Conclusion

In the city of Aq Qala, bicycle usage remains low due to a combination of subjective beliefs and objective conditions that do not favor cycling as a primary mode of urban transportation, despite its potential as a modern and efficient vehicle. The prevalent preference for private cars is conspicuous, particularly given the absence of a well-developed urban public transportation system and the prevailing cultural preference for private car usage in this small city. To address this issue, future-oriented targeted strategies are imperative to foster a cultural shift and promote the operational use of bicycles in this small northern city. This research has identified and introduced significant variables that influence bicycle usage, offering valuable insights for the development and practical implementation of bicycle initiatives not only in Aq Qala but also in other small and large cities throughout the country.
 
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Bicycle
  • Public Acceptance
  • Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) Model
  • Theory of Planned Behavior
  • Aq Qala
 
Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes (50:2), 1991, pp. 179-211.
Ajzen, I. (2006). Constructing a TPB questionnaire: Conceptual and methodological Considerations from University of Massachusetts, Icek Ajzen Theory of Planned Behavior, Web Site: www.people.umass.edu/aizen/tpb.html.
Askari, M., & Rahimi, M. (2017). A Survey for Measuring Social Acceptability of Cycling in Metropolises, Case Study: Tehran Metropolis. Journal of Applied Sociology, 28(1), 185-206. Doi: 10.22108/jas.2017.21253. [In Persian]
Askari, Mohsen (2011). Theoretical investigation of the concept of social acceptance with the help of behavior analysis theories, the first international urban bicycle conference, Tehran. [In Persian]
Audikana, A., Ravalet, E., Baranger, V., & Kaufmann, V. (2017). Implementing bikesharing systems in small cities: Evidence from the Swiss experience. Transport Policy55, 18-28.
Bruno, M. (2022). Cycling and transitions theories: A conceptual framework to assess the relationship between cycling innovations and sustainability goals. Transportation research interdisciplinary perspectives, 15, 100642.
Buehler. R; Pucher, J. (2021).” International Overview of Cycling”, IN Cycling for Sustainable Cities, Edited by Ralph Buehler and John Pucher, London: The MIT Press.
Calthorpe, P. (2004). “Foreword” In “Transit Town, Best Practices in Transit-Oriented Development” By Hank Dittmar & Gloria Ohland (Eds), London: Island Press.
Cialdini, R. B. (2007). Descriptive social norms as underappreciated sources of social control. Psychometrika72 (2), 263.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th Ed), Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology, MIS Quarterly 13(۳):319-339.
Dill, J., Mohr, C., & Ma, L. (2014). How can psychological theory help cities increase walking and bicycling?. Journal of the American Planning Association, 80 (1), 36-51.
Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
Gehl, J. (2013). Cities for people. Island press.
Gris Orange Consultant. (2009) Bike-Sharing Guide, Transport Canada, available at: www.tc.gc.ca/media/documents/programs/bsg.pdf.
Hu, H., Xu, J., Shen, Q., Shi, F., & Chen, Y. (2018). Travel mode choices in small cities of China: A case study of Changting. Transportation research part D: transport and environment59, 361-374.
Karanikola, P., Panagopoulos, T., Tampakis, S., & Tsantopoulos, G. (2018). Cycling as a smart and green mode of transport in small touristic cities. Sustainability, 10 (1), 268.
Leary, M.R. (2010). Affiliation, acceptance, and belonging. In S.T. Fiske, D.T. Gilbert & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology (5th Ed., Vol. 2, pp. 864–897). New York, NY: Wiley.
Litman, T. (2021). Evaluating criticism of smart growth. Victoria Transport Policy Institute.
Majumdar, B. B., & Mitra, S. (2015). Identification of factors influencing bicycling in small sized cities: A case study of Kharagpur, India. Case Studies on Transport Policy3(3), 331-346.
McClintock, H. (2002). “The mainstreaming of cycling policy”, In Planning for cycling Principles, practice and solutions for urban planners, Edited by Hugh McClintock, CRC Press.
Moore, G. C., Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation, Information Systems Research, 2 (3):192-222.
Moreno, C., Allam, Z., Chabaud, D., Gall, C., & Pratlong, F. (2021). Introducing the “15-Minute City”: Sustainability, resilience and place identity in future post-pandemic cities. Smart Cities4(1), 93-111.
Newman, P., & Kenworthy, J. (2015). The end of automobile dependence. In The end of automobile dependence (pp. 201-226). Island Press, Washington, DC.
 Platterziberk, Elizabeth (2008). "Chapter Eleven", in the manifesto of neo-urbanism, translated by Alireza Danesh, Reza Basiri Mozhdehi, Tehran: Urban Planning and Processing Publications, first edition, pp. 79-82. [In Persian]
Pucher, J., & Buehler, R. (2009). Cycling for a few or for everyone: The importance of social justice in cycling policy. World Transport Policy and Practice, 15(1), 57–64.
Rogers, E. (1995). Diffusion of Innovations, Free Press, New York
Saelens, B. E., Sallis, J. F., & Frank, L. D. (2003). Environmental correlates of walking and cycling: findings from the transportation, urban design, and planning literatures. Annals of behavioral medicine, 25 (2), 80-91.
Sallis, J.F. Frank, L.D. Saelens, B.E. Kraft, M.K. (2004) “Active Transportation and Physical Activity: Opportunities for Collaboration on Transportation and Public Health Research”, Transportation Research Part A, 38: 249–268.
Schade, J. & Schlag, B. (2000). Acceptability of urban transport pricing. VATT Research Report No 72. Helsinki.
Talen, Emily (2021).”NEIGHBORHOOD”, translated by Alireza Einifar, Mohammad Jalili, Tehran: New Thought Publications, first edition. [In Persian]
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information systems research, 6 (2), 144-176.
Thompson, R. L., Higgins, C. A., Howell, J. M. (1991). Personal Computing: Toward a Conceptual Model of Utilization, MIS Quarterly, 15 (1):124-143.
Uhde, A., & Hassenzahl, M. (2021). Towards a better understanding of social acceptability. In Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-6).
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS quarterly, 425-478.
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y., & Xu, X. (2016). Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: A synthesis and the road ahead. Journal of the association for Information Systems, 17(5), 328-376.
Wolsink, M. (2018). Social acceptance revisited: gaps, questionable trends, and an auspicious perspective. Energy research & social science, 46, 287-295.
Woodward, A., & Wild, K. (2020). Active transportation, physical activity, and health. In Advances in transportation and health (pp. 133-148). Elsevier.
Yazdanpanah, R. (2021). Sociological Study of Changes in Social Acceptance Methods in Youth. Witness the thought, 2(1), 105-132. [In Persian]